Historic Pelham

Presenting the rich history of Pelham, NY in Westchester County: current historical research, descriptions of how to research Pelham history online and genealogy discussions of Pelham families.

Friday, July 21, 2017

Pelham Firemen Turned Their Hoses on Trolley Construction Crew in 1898


In the late 19th century, rival trolley companies raced to construct lines throughout the New York region.  Rivalries among competing trolley companies led to at least one instance of violence in the Village of North Pelham in 1898 when local firemen had to turn their hoses on a trolley construction gang to halt its work.  The dispute led to a lawsuit in which the Court ruled that two rival trolley companies both had valid franchises to build trolley tracks on Fourth Street (today's Lincoln Avenue) and that the first to lay tracks would perfect its franchise. That decision, of course, set off a race.  I have written before about a portion of this dispute.  See:  Mon., Dec. 07, 2009:  Report of Fight with Trolley Construction Crew in Pelhamville in 1898.

The origins of the incident may be traced to a few years before when North Pelham Trustees granted a trolley franchise to a start up company to build a line through North Pelham on Fourth Street (i.e., Lincoln Avenue) connecting lines in Mount Vernon and New Rochelle through North Pelham.  

The start up failed.  Among its only assets was the franchise granted by North Pelham which it sold to the New York and Connecticut Traction Company.  The New York and Connecticut Traction Company, however, did not construct the tracks.

The Board of Trustees of North Pelham became impatient.  On Saturday, March 5, 1898, the Board met to address the issue.  The Board concluded that the original franchise had been forfeited through interaction.  The Board granted a new franchise to the Union Electric Railway Company which had been active in the successful development of lines in southern Westchester.  This time, however, the Village Board included conditions "that the tracks shall be laid and cars running within six months and that cars shall meet all the trains on the New Haven Railroad at Pelham and all those on the Harlem River Branch at Pelham Manor station."

The "Union Company" as it was called, had not laid the tracks after the passage of six months.  The owner of the original franchise, the New York and Connecticut Traction Company, decided to try to steal a march on the Village and on the Union Company.  

On Saturday, October 1, 1898, a massive group of 150 laborers from Brooklyn descended on North Pelham and collected at the intersection of today's Lincoln Avenue and Fifth Avenue.  Carloads of construction materials appeared as well.  Within minutes, a foreman working on behalf of the New York and Connecticut Traction Company had the workers digging up Fourth Street to lay a foundation on which ties and rails would be laid for new trolley tracks.  

Within a short time, the laborers had laid nearly 150 feet of new trolley tracks when North Pelham Trustee Barker happened upon the scene in his wagon.  He ordered the laborers to stop their work.  The foreman and workers ignored him.  Trustee Barker tracked down a Town Constable and ordered him to arrest the leaders.  The Constable arrested the foreman and three laborers and marched them off to a local lockup.

The remaining laborers never ceased their work.  The dedicated Village Trustee next drove his wagon a section of trench to halt the work.  The workers in the trench scattered to avoid injury.  They hesitated only a moment, however, then swarmed around the Trustee, seized his wagon, and carried it out of the way so they could resume their work.  

Seeking help, Trustee Barker first contacted the Chief of Police in Mount Vernon who politely told him the matter was out of his jurisdiction and no help would be sent.  Next, Trustee Barker had a fire alarm sounded.  Local firemen arrived quickly, together with one truck, one engine, and a hose cart.  At Trustee Barker's request the Pelham firemen attached a hose to a nearby hydrant and turned a violent stream of water on the gang of laborers.  Within moments, the laborers couldn't take it anymore, scrambled out of the work area, and sought shelter in nearby woods.

While the Pelham firemen stood guard over the area with their fire hose ready, Trustee Barker had someone send word to a Union Company official who promptly sent a foreman and 150 Union Company laborers who promptly ripped up the 150 feet of tracks and ties while the firemen stood guard.  By the evening of the same day, the president of the Union Company arrived at the scene in Pelham with two carloads of laborers to reinforce the 150 Union Company men already there.  

As soon as material arrived, the Union Company quickly began building its own set of tracks on Fourth Street.  Its men worked quickly and work progressed nicely until nightfall when a temporary restraining order obtained on behalf of the New York and Connecticut Traction Company was served on them.  Work stopped immediately.  The matter was now the subject of a lawsuit.

On Tuesday, January 31, 1899, a State court judge decided the matter.  The judge ruled that both franchises had been properly granted and that "the company which first put its track down would be the one to make good its right to the street."  The race began.

The Union Company was incredibly fast.  Less than twelve hours after the decision was released, it had a gang of laborers and two carloads of material on the scene at Fourth Street and Fifth Avenue in Pelham.  The laborers worked all night and, by the next morning (February 1, 1899), the trolley tracks were "practically completed."

The Union Company won the race.  Trolley tracks finally connected Mount Vernon and New Rochelle along the roadway known today as Lincoln Avenue.



Detail of Map Published in 1924 With Dashed Lines Showing 
Trolley Lines. Note the Trolley Line that Crosses North Pelham
from Mount Vernon to New Rochelle on Fourth Street (Lincoln Ave.)
Source: Fairchild, John F., "STREET MAP OF THE CITY OF MOUNT
N.Y." (1924) (From the Digital Collections of the Westchester County
Archive). NOTE: Click on Image to Enlarge.

*          *          *          *          *

Below is the text of a number of news articles regarding the subject of today's Historic Pelham article.  Each is followed by a citation and link to its source.

"A FRANCHISE GRANTED IN PELHAM.

The Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham held a meeting last Saturday evening at the residence of Mr. Ralph K. Hubbard on Pelham Heights.  The most important business transacted was the granting of a franchise to the Union Electric Railway Company to operate an electric road from the corner of Wolf's Lane and Third street, (where its route at present turns to go to North Pelham) down Wolf's Lane to the Boston Post Road and up the Boston Post Road as far as Pelhamdale avenue.  For the balance of the Post Road the Union Company has a franchise from the Pelham Manor authorities.

The conditions of the franchise are that the tracks shall be laid and cars running within six months and that cars shall meet all the trains on the New Haven Railroad at Pelham and all those on the Harlem River Branch at Pelham Manor station.

Messrs. I. C. Hill and Alexander Kennedy, the Citizens' Committee on trolley extensions appointed by the North Pelham trustees, attended the meeting.  Mr. John Maher, president of the Union Road, was also president of the Union Road, was also present and stated that he thought if it were found feasible to do so, the line of the company would be extended to the northern boundary of North Pelham in the near future."

Source:  A FRANCHISE GRANTED IN PELHAM, The Chronicle [Mount Vernon, NY], Mar. 11, 1898, p. 3, col. 3.  

"TURNED HOSE ON ITALIANS.
------
FIREMEN CALLED ON TO SETTLE A TROLLEY LINE WAR.
-----
A Gang of Laborers Driven from Trenches by the Fire Department of New Pelham -- Outcome of Fight Between Rival Traction Companies for a Westchester Franchise.

NEW ROCHELLE, N. Y., Oct. 1. -- The rivalry between the Union Trolley Company and the New York and Connecticut Traction Company resulted in a fight this afternoon in the village of North Pelham, necessitating the calling out of the Fire Department.

The trouble between the two companies dates back seven years, when the traction company received a franchise from the trustees of North Pelham to construct a line connecting Mount Vernon with New Rochelle.  The trustees granted the franchise on the condition that the line should be in operation inside of a year.  Last month the trustees granted a franchise to the Union Company, known as the Huckleberry road, over the same route, on the ground that the Traction Company had violated its franchise.

The Union Company was to have begun work as soon as it had completed its system in New Rochelle.  To-day, however, the Traction Company decided to steal a march on its rival.

Early this afternoon 150 Italians from Brooklyn, under Foreman Mack, arrived at North Pelham and started to tear up the road at Fourth street and Fifth avenue.  They had succeeded in laying about 150 feet of track when Trustee Barker drove up and ordered them to stop.  The laborers refused to obey the order and Barker ordered Constable Marks to arrest some of the men.  Marks picked out Foreman Mack and three of his laborers and took them to the village lock-up.  The other laborers kept on digging the trenches.  Trustee Barker drove his wagon in the trench, scattering the Italians.

After a moment's hesitation, they swarmed around Barker, and, seizing the wagon, carried it over to the other side of the road.  At this juncture someone turned in the fire alarm, which brought to the scene one truck, a hose cart, and an engine.  The firemen turned the hose on the gang of laborers, who finally sought shelter in the woods.

The stream was so powerful that Fireman Stanman, who was holding the nozzle, was knocked down and badly bruised.  The Pelham authorities asked Mount Vernon police for help, but Chief Foley refused, as it was not in his jurisdiction.

Foreman Hannon of the Union Company heard of the disturbance and hurried with the 150 men he had at work there to Pelham.  His men ripped up the ties while the Fire Department stood guard with the hose.  President Maher of the Union Company arrived this evening, and brought up two carloads of Italians from West Farms to reinforce his men.  At nightfall the Union Company was in full possession of the road."

Source:  TURNED HOSE ON ITALIANS -- FIREMEN CALLED ON TO SETTLE A TROLLEY LINE WAR, The Sun [NY, NY], Oct. 2, 1898, Vol. LXVI, No. 32, p. 4, col. 5.  

"TROLLEY FIGHT IN PELHAM.
-----
A Gang of Men Driven Off by Turning Hose on Them.
-----

Saturday afternoon last a trolley battle was fought in the village of Pelham, between the gangs of the Connecticut Traction Company and the village authorities and the Union Railroad forces.

The Traction Company's gang, which started in during the early afternoon to lay rails on Fourth street, was finally driven off by the local fire department, which turned two streams of water from nearby hydrants on the invading army of Italians.

The trouble dates back to the last meeting of the Pelham Village Trustees.  At that time an old trolley franchise, which was granted seven years ago, and later bought up by the Connecticut Traction people, was revoked, and a new franchise granted over those streets through to New Rochelle to the Union Railway.

The Connecticut Traction Company, to block the latest move of their rivals, on Saturday afternoon sent a gang of two hundred and fifty Italians to Pelham, who appeared suddenly on Fourth street.  Soon after several loads of rails and ties were carted on the road and in an hour many rods of trolley line had been laid.  Everything went along smoothly, until Trustee Barker happened to drive along.  When he saw what was up, he jumped from his wagon and ordered the foreman and his gang to quit work, but they refused.

By this time President Lynch, of the village and several other village trustees had arrived on the scene, but the gang still kept on laying tracks.

Mr. Lynch telephoned Chief Foley, of Mount Vernon, and asked him to send a detachment of police to Pelham.

Chief Foley said the trouble was out of the jurisdiction of the Mount Vernon police, and he could do nothing.

Then some one made a suggestion that the Pelham fire department be called out to turn two streams of water on the invaders.  This suggestion was acted on, and a few minutes later the fire bells were ringing madly.  Soon after the hose cart and ladder truck appeared on the scene.  The firemen coupled their hose to the hydrants and, under the direction of President Lynch, turned two streams of cold water on the gang of trolley layers.

In the meantime word was sent Foreman Hannon, who had a gang of men numbering two hundred and fifty at work in Pelham Manor, on the Union Company's lines.

As soon as he heard that the rival company were at work, he loaded his men into wagons, and ordering several loads of rails and ties to follow him started with his gang for Fourth street, Pelham.  When the Union gang arrived they found the Traction crowd had been driven to the woods by the streams of water, which had been turned on them.

Foreman Hannon immediately directed his men to tear up the tracks just laid by the Traction people, and they went at it with such a will, that in a few hours every rail and tie which had been laid was torn up.  They then started to replace them with the Union Company's stock, which had been brought up on their trucks.  

The Union gang worked until nearly nightfall, when an injunction, granted by Supreme Court Justice Dickey, was served on them and work stopped.

There the matter will rest until the motion to make the injunction permanent is argued."

Source:  TROLLEY FIGHT IN PELHAM -- A Gang of Men Driven Off by Turning Hose on Them, The New Rochelle Pioneer, Oct. 8, 1898, Vol. XXIV, No. 19, p. 1, col. 4.  

"UNION COMPANY'S QUICK WORK.
-----
Acted Promptly on Court Decision and Laid Tracks Ahead of Its Rival.

MOUNT VERNON, N. Y., Feb. 1. -- Supreme Court Justice Gaynor on Tuesday afternoon decided a disputed trolley franchise question in such a way that neither of the contestants won.  Within twelve hours one of them had taken advantage of the decision and shut out its rival.  The Union Company which operates roads in the Bronx and in Westchester County, claimed a franchise through Fourth Street in North Pelham by virtue of a franchise granted to it by the Trustees.  The New York, Westchester and Connecticut Traction Company claimed the right to run through the same street by virtue of a franchise previously granted to another company which has gone out of existence, and which sold its only asset, the franchise, to the traction company.

The latter company in October last attempted to lay rails through Fourth Street.  This was after the Union Company had applied to the North Pelham Trustees for a franchise.  The Trustees held that the old franchise had lapsed because the original company had not made any attempt to take advantage of it, nor had its successor within a reasonable time.  The Union Company obtained an injunction restraining the Traction Company from constructing its road through Fourth Street, but before the injunction could have been served the road would have been built but for prompt action on the part of the Trustees.  They called out the Fire Department, and when the gang of Italians at work on the street refused to stop work the firemen drove them off with streams of water from the hose.

Since then the disputed franchises had been in the courts.  Justice Gaynor on Tuesday held that both franchises had been properly granted and that the company which first put its tracks down would be the one to make good its right to the street.  The Union Company acted promptly in following up this decision.  Immediately after it was given a construction gang was organized and sent to the disputed street, and two carloads of material followed within a short time.  By morning the road was practically completed, and to-night it is almost ready for use  So far as is known, the Westchester and Connecticut people did not act upon the decision."

Source:  UNION COMPANY'S QUICK WORK -- Acted Promptly on Court Decision and Laid Tracks Ahead of Its Rival, N.Y. Times, Feb. 2, 1899, p. 5, col. 5.  

"RIVAL LAID TROLLEY ROAD IN ONE NIGHT
-----

MOUNT VERNON, N. Y., Wednesday. -- Supreme Court Justice Gaynor on Tuesday afternoon decided a disputed trolley franchise question in such a way that it lay with the enterprise of either of the contestants to win.  By this morning one of them had taken advantage of the decision and shut out its rival by building a road.

The Union Company claimed a franchise through Fourth street in North Pelham, by virtue of a franchise granted to it by the trustees.  The New York, Westchester and Connecticut Traction Company claimed the right to run through the same street by virtue of a franchise purchased from another company, which has gone out of existence.  The Westchester and Connecticut, on October last, attempted to lay rails through Fourth street.  The trustees held that the old franchise had lapsed.  The Union Company obtained an injunction, but before it could have been served the road would have been built, but for prompt action on the part of the trustees.  They called out the Fire Department, and when the laborers refused to stop work the firemen drove them off with streams of water.

Justice Gaynor held that both franchises had been properly granted and that the company which first put its track down would be the one to make good its right to the street.  The Union Company immediately sent a construction gang and two carloads of material to the disputed street, and by morning the road was practically completed."

Source:  RIVAL LAID TROLLEY ROAD IN ONE NIGHT, New York Herald, Feb. 2, 1899, p. 14, col. 2.  

"PELHAM'S NEWS AND NOTES
-----
Happenings of Special Interest to Her People. . . . 

The amount which the Westchester Electric Railway Company will have to pay the Village of North Pelham as its share of the cost of macadamizing Fifth avenue and Fourth street, is $3,021.17. . . ."

Source:  PELHAM'S NEWS AND NOTES -- Happenings of Special Interest to Her People, Mount Vernon Daily Argus [Mount Vernon, NY], Aug. 17, 1899, Vol. XXX, No. 2,266, p. 1, col. 3.

Archive of the Historic Pelham Web Site.
Home Page of the Historic Pelham Blog.
Order a Copy of "Thomas Pell and the Legend of the Pell Treaty Oak."

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Pelham Manor Residents Complained of Awful Service on the Toonerville Trolley Line as Early as 1899


On August 8, 1909, Fontaine Fox made a now-famous trip on the little trolley line that once ran from Pelham Station down Wolfs Lane, onto Colonial Avenue and then Pelhamdale Avenue to a stop near the railroad bridge of the New Haven Branch Line.  As he later affirmed in letters, newspaper and magazine interviews, and conversations, Fontaine Fox was inspired by his ride on the Pelham Manor trolley line to create the "Toonerville Trolley" and its bearded "Skipper," a central tenet of his wildly-successful comic strip "Toonerville Folks" that he syndicated and that ran in hundreds of newspapers throughout the United States for fifty years.

Barely a year after Fontaine Fox rode the rickety little Pelham Manor trolley, the Westchester Electric Railway extended the Pelham Manor trolley line along Pelhamdale Avenue to Shore Road near the New York Athletic Club.  The history of the little trolley line is fascinating in its own right.

Since the founding of the little trolley line in 1896, the Pelham Manor trolley was expected to "meet all the trains" arriving at Pelham Station and Pelham Manor Station.  Indeed, Fontaine Fox entitled many of the comics he published "The Toonerville Trolley That Meets All the Trains."  



"The Toonerville Trolley That Meets All
the Trains."  Source:  The Toonerville
Union, Apr. 12, 1920, No. 43, p. 4, cols. 3-4.
NOTE:  Click on Image to Enlarge.

In 1896, the five-year-old Village of Pelham Manor granted the Union Railroad Company a franchise to operate trolley lines from the border with the Village of Pelham at Colonial Avenue along Pelhamdale Avenue to the railroad bridge near the Pelham Manor Station and along today's Boston Post Road from Pelhamdale Avenue to the border with New Rochelle.  Embarrassingly, the Union Railroad Company failed to file a certificate of its franchise with the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York.  In subsequent litigation, this failure prompted courts to rule the franchise to be illegal.  

In 1899, the Union Railroad Company attempted to remedy its failure by seeking a "renewal" of its franchise from the Village of Pelham Manor.  Showing chutzpah, however, the company sought more than a mere "renewal."  Instead, it sought to expand the line to run it further along Pelhamdale Avenue to Shore Road and then along a tiny portion of Shore Road in Pelham Manor to the New Rochelle border where it would connect with a New Rochelle line.

Pelham Manor residents were unhappy with the proposal.  The stretch of Pelhamdale Avenue east of the railroad bridge was a bucolic, beautiful, and still rural part of Pelham Manor.  Additionally, the portion of Shore Road that would be affected was considered "a beautiful riding and driving thoroughfare skirting Pelham Bay Park."  

During the week of January 23, 1899, a crescendo of local opposition to Union Railroad Company prompted the company to "withdraw" portions of its renewal request to limit it to a true "renewal" of the original franchise with no expansion of the line further along Pelhamdale Avenue and along Shore Road in Pelham Manor.  Nevertheless, Pelham Manor residents were not satisfied.

On Tuesday, January 31, 1899, during a meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham Manor, Pelham Manor residents appeared and "made it clear to the trustees that no trolley road would be tolerated, either on the Shore Road or on that part of Pelhamdale-ave. desired by the company."  

Two days later, on Thursday, February 2, 1899, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham Manor met again to consider whether to relieve Union Railroad Company "of its embarrassing position of running its cars without a legal right in the manor, by injecting new life into its defective franchise" with a simple renewal of the original franchise.  Pelham resident and civil engineer John F. Fairchild appeared at the meeting on behalf of the Union Railroad Company.  Fairchild served as engineer of the Union Railroad Company.  

During the meeting, a long-time notable resident of Pelham Manor, Alfred L. Hammett, read a protest "against the miserable service being furnished by the company between Mount Vernon, Pelham Manor and New-Rochelle."  Thereafter, Village President Ezra T. Gilliland piled on, giving his own account of recent miserable service.  One report noted:

"President E. T. Gilliland, who was chairman of the meeting, related his own experience.  He said that yesterday afternoon he came out to North Pelham on the 3 o'clock train from New-York, expecting to take a trolley-car for his home, in Pelham Manor.  He waited at the railroad station for ten minutes in the frigid weather, and then, being unable to get a car, walked home a distance of nearly two miles, through the snow.  'On my way to Pelham Manor,' said Mr. Gilliland, 'I passed two or three cars going in the opposite direction, but none came along that were going my way.'  This condition of affairs, he said, existed, notwithstanding the fact the company in its original franchise had promised to meet every train on the New-Haven Railroad until 1 o'clock each morning."

The Board of Trustees then considered the proposed renewal franchise "section by section."  On behalf of the trolley line, John F. Fairchild promised that the failure of the trolley to meet all trains at Pelham Station as required by the original franchise "would be remedied."  To ensure that the promise would be kept, the board "re-adopted" the franchise on the condition that the company post a bond of $25,000 to ensure that it carried out its "numerous promises."  

It was not until 1910 that the Pelham Manor trolley line was expanded along Pelhamdale to Shore Road where it ended.  Pelham Manor never agreed to permit the trolley company to expand the line along Shore Road to connect with New Rochelle.

What was really going on during this period in 1899?  Actually, it is readily apparent.  The Union Railroad Company never wanted to build the spur of the trolley line from Boston Post Road down Pelhamdale Avenue to the Pelham Manor Train Station because it never believed the spur would be profitable.  The company was required to build the spur, however, by the Pelham Manor Board of Trustees in order to obtain the franchise that it really wanted between Colonial Avenue and onto Boston Post Road into New Rochelle to connect Mount Vernon, Pelham, and New Rochelle, a line that it felt confident would be profitable.

It turns out that as the Union Railroad Company feared, the tiny little spur of the Pelham Manor trolley line from Boston Post Road to Pelham Manor Station was not profitable.  The company hoped to extend the line from the Pelham Manor Station along Pelhamdale Avenue to Shore Road to capture the many, many thousands per year who rode the branch line to Pelham Manor Station, then hopped off and walked to Shore Road to get to the New York Athletic Club on Travers Island.  Moreover, by extending that portion of the line along Shore Road onto Pelham Road in New Rochelle to connect with New Rochelle, the company hoped to attract additional riders on the little spur traveling to the Sound Shore region of New Rochelle.  Pelham Manor residents, in contrast, did not want hordes of people passing through the quiet and bucolic section of Pelham Manor along Pelhamdale Avenue and Shore Road just to get to and from New Rochelle.



Detail from a Photograph in the Collections
of the Westchester County Historical Society
Showing "Four Corners," the Intersection of
Pelhamdale Avenue and Boston Post Road
Before 1937. The "H Line" Trolley is Returning
from Shore Road Toward the Intersection.
At this Intersection, Trolley Tracks Along
Pelhamdale Avenue Split With Some Tracks
Turning Onto Boston Post Road Toward New
Rochelle and Others Continuing Along Pelhamdale
Avenue. NOTE: Click on Image to Enlarge.

*          *          *          *          *

"NO EXTENSIONS GRANTED.
-----
PELHAM MANOR TRUSTEES RENEW THE UNION TROLLEY FRANCHISE.
-----
MISERABLE SERVICE TOLD OF BY CITIZENS AT THE MEETING LAST EVENING -- COMPANY UNDER A $25,000 BOND.

The trustees of Pelham Manor held a second meeting last night to consider the application of the Union Railroad Company for a renewal of its franchise.  The company is already operating a streetcar system which connects the Manor with Mount Vernon and New-Rochelle by virtue of a franchise given it in 1896, but which has since been held by the courts to be illegal, owing to the failure by the company to deposit with the Secretary of State a certificate of the right given to it by the authorities of the Manor.  The new charter applied for included a request for several additional streets not mentioned in the invalid franchise, among them Pelhamdale-ave., from the New-York, New-Haven and Hartford Suburban Road station to the Shore Road, a beautiful riding and driving thoroughfare skirting Pelham Bay Park, and connecting Pelham Manor with New-Rochelle, City Island and West Chester, and from a point near the gates of the country home of the New-York Athletic Club along the Shore Road to New-Rochelle and Glen Island.

At a public meeting on Tuesday night of this week the citizens made it clear to the trustees that no trolley road would be tolerated, either on the Shore Road or on that part of Pelhamdale-ave. desired by the company.

In view of the overwhelming opposition to its plans the company last week withdrew those sections of its application, and the trustees have relieved it of its embarrassing position of running its cars without a legal right in the manor, by injecting new life into its defective franchise.

At the meeting, last evening a protest was read from A. L. Hammett, a prominent citizen, against the miserable service being furnished by the company between Mount Vernon, Pelham Manor and New-Rochelle, President E. T. Gilliland, who was chairman of the meeting, related his own experience.  He said that yesterday afternoon he came out to North Pelham on the 3 o'clock train from New-York, expecting to take a trolley-car for his home, in Pelham Manor.  He waited at the railroad station for ten minutes in the frigid weather, and then, being unable to get a car, walked home a distance of nearly two miles, through the snow.

'On my way to Pelham Manor,' said Mr. Gilliland, 'I passed two or three cars going in the opposite direction, but none came along that were going my way.'  This condition of affairs, he said, existed, notwithstanding the fact the company in its original franchise had promised to meet every train on the New-Haven Railroad until 1 o'clock each morning.

John F. Fairchild, engineer of the company, who was present in its behalf, said that this condition would be remedied, but that the company must first get some additional rights on the highway, in order to build switches and turnouts.  The trustees in re-adopting the franchise took it up section by section, and held the trolley corporation down to a bond of $25,000 to carry out its numerous promises.

One of the trustees in speaking of the franchise said:  'We have simply given the company what it has already, and declined to allow it to make any more extensions for the present.'

The company operates lines in Pelham Manor, as follow:  From the junction of Pelhamdale-ave. to the bridge of the Harlem River branch of the New-Haven Railroad.  The meeting did not adjourn until nearly midnight.

A hearing on the application of the Tarrytown, White Plains and Mamaroneck Road for a franchise from White Plains to Mount Vernon will be held in Scarsdale before the Highway Commissioner to-day."

Source:  NO EXTENSIONS GRANTED -- PELHAM MANOR TRUSTEES RENEW THE UNION TROLLEY FRANCHISE -- MISERABLE SERVICE TOLD OF BY CITIZENS AT THE MEETING LAST EVENING -- COMPANY UNDER A $25,000 BOND, New-York Tribune, Feb. 3, 1899, p. 2, col. 2 (Note:  Paid subscription required to access via this link).

*          *          *          *          *

Below is a bibliography including links to a few of my many previous postings dealing with the topics of the "Toonerville Trolley," horse-drawn railroad cars, electric trolleys and other trolley-related information pertinent to Pelham, New York.

Bell, Blake A., Pelham and the Toonerville Trolley, 82(4) The Westchester Historian, pp. 96-111 (Fall 2006).


Bell, Blake A., Pelham and the Toonerville Trolley, The Pelham Weekly, Vol. XIII, No. 11, Mar. 12, 2004, p. 10, col. 1.

Fri., May 27, 2016:  Was Max "Maxie" Martin the Man Who Was the Skipper on the Pelham Manor Trolley the Day Fontaine Fox Rode the Line and Was Inspired?

Mon., Oct. 19, 2015:  Rioting Strikers Attacked Pelham Trolley Passengers and Fought With Pelham Police in the Great Streetcar Strike of 1916.  

Thu., Sep. 10, 2015:  Pelham Manor Citizens Voted to Reject Bus Service and Keep Their Toonerville Trolley in 1936.

Fri., Jul. 24, 2015:  The Day the Brakes Failed on the Pelham Manor Trolley, Inspiration for the Toonerville Trolley.

Wed., Mar. 19, 2014:  Another Confirmation the Famous "Toonerville Trolley" was Inspired by the Pelham Manor Trolley in 1909.

Wed., Mar. 25, 2009:  Another Brief Account by Fontaine Fox Describing Trolley in Pelham Manor as Inspiration for Toonerville Trolley Comic Strip.

Tue., Apr. 19, 2005:   Pelham Manor Residents Fight Construction of the Toonerville Trolley Line

Fri., Jun. 17, 2005:  "Skipper Louie" of Pelham Manor's Toonerville Trolley

Tue., Sep. 20, 2005:  Pelham's "Toonerville Trolley" Goes to War

Tue., Oct. 11, 2005:  The Toonerville Trolley Pays Its Bills -- Late!


Thu., Mar. 09, 2006:  Photographs of the H Line and A Line Trolleys on and Near Pelhamdale Avenue.

Thu., Jul. 06, 2006:  Who Was the Skipper on the Pelham Manor Trolley the Day Fontaine Fox Rode the Line and Was Inspired?

Wed., Aug. 9, 2006:  The Saddest Day in the History of Pelham Manor's "Toonerville Trolley"


Tue., Sep. 19, 2006:  Toonerville Trolley Cartoons Available For Free Viewing Online.  


Mon., Mar. 05, 2007:  An Ode to the Toonerville Trolley and its Skipper Published in 1921.

Mon., May 28, 2007:  Brief Biography of Henry De Witt Carey, 19th Century Pelham Justice of the Peace.

Thu., Jul. 30, 2009:  Pelham-Related Trolley Franchises Granted in 1897.

Mon., Aug. 17, 2009:  Efforts by Pelham Landowners in 1900 to Halt Construction of a Trolley Line on Shore Road.

Thu., Aug. 27, 2009:  October 19, 1898 Report that the Tracks of the Toonerville Trolley Line Had Been Laid in Pelham.  

Wed., Dec. 23, 2009:  Attack on the Toonerville Trolley Line by Strikers in 1916

Wed., Dec. 30, 2009:  Opening of the Extension of the Pelham Manor Trolley Line in 1910 -- The Toonerville Trolley Line.

Tue., Jan. 05, 2010:  More on the Extension of the Pelham Manor Trolley Line in 1910 -- The Toonerville Trolley Line.


Wed., Mar. 05, 2014:  Trolleys Come to Pelham in the 1890s.

Tue., Jan. 06, 2015:  Extension of the Toonerville Trolley Line in Pelham Manor in 1910.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 07, 2009

Report of Fight with Trolley Construction Crew in Pelhamville in 1898


In the late 19th century, rival trolley companies raced to construct lines throughout the New York region.  Rivalries among competing trolley lines led to at least one instance of violence in Pelhamville in 1898.  A fascinating account of the incident appeared in the October 8, 1898 issue of New Rochelle Pioneer.  The account appears below.

"TROLLEY ROW AT PELHAMVILLE.

-----

The little village of Pelhamville has a very lively railroad row on its hands the outcome of which will be watched with the keenest interest by the friends of the Union Trolley Company and the New York and Connecticut Traction Company. 

The rivalry between the Union and the Connecticut company precipitated a fight in Pelhamville Saturday afternoon. 

The trouble between the two companies dates back several years, when the Traction company received a franchise from the Trustees of North Pelham to construct a line connecting Mt. Vernon and New Rochelle.  The trustees granted the franchise on the condition that the line should be in operation inside of a year.  Last month the trustees granted a franchise to the Union Company, known as the Huckleberry road, over the same route, on the ground that the Traction Company had violated its franchise.

The Union Company was to have commenced work on this new franchise as soon as their lines to New Rochelle had been completed.

The Traction Company on Saturday decided to steal a march on its rival, and early in the afternoon a gang of Italians appeared on the ground and started to tear up the road at Fourth street and Fifth avenue, North Pelham.  The men under foreman Mack had succeeded in laying several feet of track when Councilmen Vincent Barker and George McGalliard drove up and ordered the men to stop. 

They refused to do so and Constable Marks, who appeared on the scene, arrested the foreman of the gang and some of the laborers.

Later the Councilmen were joined by Village President M. J. Lynch, Dr. Charles Barker, James Seaman, James Riley and John Case, who tried to block the street in order to prevent the transportation of rails.  Dr. Barker drove his buggy into th excavated tracks, but the Italians picked it up and removed it. 

At this juncture some members of the fire department appeared.  They turned the fire hose onto the gang of Italians who scattered into the woods. 

Word was telephoned to the Mt. Vernon police for assistance, but Chief Foley could not send men where he had no jurisdiction over them, and he was obliged to refuse the request. 

Contractor Smith's men were called on to fill in the excavated trenches and restore the street to its proper condition. 

Foreman Hannon, of the Union Company, who has a gang of men at work in New Rochelle, heard of the trouble, and hurried his force into Pelhamville, and started to lay a line of tracks for the Union Company. 

The Connecticut Company, anticipating some more trouble of this character, had procured an injunction from Justice Dickey, of the Supreme Court, Brooklyn, which was served on the Union Company, and for the time being work ceased.

The Union Company being in possession of the field, kept an army of Italians on the streets all Saturday night and all day Sunday."

Source:  Trolley Row at Pelhamville, New Rochelle Pioneer, Oct. 8, 1898, p. 1, col. 1.

Please Visit the Historic Pelham Web Site
Located at http://www.historicpelham.com/.
Please Click Here for Index to All Blog Postings.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,