For nearly four decades during the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s Alfred L. Gamber of Chester Park, a banker with the Pelham National Bank, Bankers Trust Company, and other institutions at various times, also served as secretary, executive secretary, clerk, assistant treasurer, and treasurer of the Board of Education in charge of the Pelham Union Free School District No. 1. Gamber also owned and lived on a small "farm" at 16 Maple Avenue.
Well, truth be told, Chester Park residents called the property a farm. In reality, Alfred Gamber lived in a small residence on a small lot near the front entrance to the Chester Park Green. On that property he kept a chicken coop filled with prize Rhode Island Red Roosters and hens. He also bred and raised pedigreed bird dogs (Irish Setters and English Setters), exhibition pigeons (twenty four of them kept in "one little coop") and other animals on his premises. As one might expect, the noisy animal menagerie and its irksome odors drove his neighbors crazy.
Rhode Island Red Rooster.
NOTE: Click on Image to Enlarge.
Though a respected citizen of the Village of North Pelham, during the 1930s Gamber and his tiny "farm" were responsible for the enactment of Village ordinances adopted to deal with nuisances arising on his property. The drama evoked a case of Farm versus Village, one of the last of many such battles experienced by Pelham as the Town became fully developed entirely within its boundaries with no room remaining for farm animals -- much less farms.
Most nights, the yelping, barking, and baying bird dogs sang to the moon. One Rhode Island Red rooster began to crow every morning at 3:00 a.m. Then, each morning at dawn, the rooster began crowing incessantly for at least forty minutes. Throughout each day the dogs howled and barked. All day and all night all the time the traditional odors of a hen yard and a dog kennel wafted over the Chester Park neighborhood.
According to countless news stories, in 1934 the women of Chester Park rose in resistance to shut the animal menagerie down. They were mad as Hell and weren't going to take it anymore. Five women living in nearby homes on Maple Avenue and Linden Place banded together.
At first, one of them called the police. She later lamented, however, that "I got no satisfaction."
Next they complained to the Westchester County Health Department. That government office sent an inspector to Gamber's home at 16 Maple Avenue. No health violations were found and the County Health Department "approved" Gamber's assemblage of animals.
Next, they demanded a hearing before the Board of Trustees of the Village of North Pelham, hauling Alfred Gamber before the Board to respond to their complaints. On Thursday evening, September 13, 1934, the five women and Alfred Gamber appeared before the Board of the Village of North Pelham. The women told of sleepless nights, terrific odors, and an inability to sell or rent property due to the nuisance. They alleged Gamber was operating a business in a residential neighborhood in violation of a Village zoning ordinance. They said he was selling puppies as well as eggs laid by his hens. They demanded the whole affair be shut down with an "or else" quality in their presentations.
Alfred Gamber countered that he was a sporting man who raised bird-dogs and kept chickens and pigeons as a hobby. He pointed out that others in the Village of North Pelham kept chickens. He asserted that there was nothing wrong with selling puppies rather than keeping them after birth, particularly when the complainants claimed he had too many dogs. He pointed out that neither dogs nor eggs were his business. He also said that he would give up his chickens if everyone else in the Village of North Pelham who kept chickens gave them up as well. He presented a pair of friends who testified his property was not a nuisance that that he harbored the animals as a sportsman, not as a business.
The Board of Trustees indicated that it might enact an ordinance to deal with the situation at its next meeting. The Board knew, however, that an ordinance banning dogs, kennels, chickens, and the like would have wide-ranging implications that could ripple throughout the village and adversely impact others whose animals presented no nuisances.
The following Thursday, September 20, the Board met again. It implemented a partial solution. It enacted an anti-noise ordinance "against off-key sounds of the type that can be classed as noise. This means barking dogs, crowing roosters, ringing bells, grinding machinery, or any sound whatsoever that would tend to interrupt the slumbers of the villagers during the night (thus impairing their health) and any other unnecessary noises that would disturb the peace and quiet of the village during daylight hours." Those who violated the ordinance were subject to a $25 fine and five days in jail.
Within days a copy of the new anti-noise ordinance was served on Alfred Gamber who immediately took action. According to one account, noisy fowl were "eliminated by culinary preparation."
As one might expect, however, the matter did not end there. Gamber still maintained hens, pigeons, Irish Setters, and English Setters on his premises. A long-running feud seems to have continued.
The neighbors continued to complain about the nuisance presented by the animals on Gamber's property. Thus, in mid-1935 the Village Board asked the Westchester County Board of Health to visit Gamber's premises again for another inspection. The Board of Health inspected the chicken coop, finding that it held 14 Rhode Island Red hens and "a number of pigeons." To the disappointment of the Board and Gamber's neighbors, however, the Board of Health further concluded that the animals were "kept according to statute and violated no provisions of the Health Code."
Still the neighbors complained. Perhaps in retaliation or perhaps not, Gamber began burning rubbish on his property periodically.
One of the neighbors who had complained to the Board before enactment of the anti-noise ordinance appeared before the Board again on Wednesday, November 13, 1935. She complained that "Farmer" Gamber was harboring 76 animals including chickens, pigeons, and dogs on his property. She further complained that he had begun burning rubbish on his property in periodic "bonfires" and that the noxious fumes were a nuisance.
The reaction of the Board of Trustees was immediate and firm. Upon hearing from the complainant, the Board adopted an ordinance banning the burning of rubbish within the Village of North Pelham. According to one account, the debate was rather quick:
"'Then,' said the trustee, almost in a body, 'we'll make an ordinance against burning rubbish!'
'But will it be constitutional?' asked someone.
'Never mind about that,' replied Trustee Bollettieri. 'Everybody seems to be testing the constitutionality of laws these days. We'll make the ordinance and let somebody else test it.'
The ordinance was adopted unanimously.'"
The Gamber "Farm" and "Animal Menagerie" at 16 Maple Avenue in Chester Park thus was responsible for yet another Village ordinance. It seems that, rather quickly, the battle of farm versus village was ebbing in favor of village. . . . .
Detail from 1929 Map Showing Chester Park and the Maple
Avenue Area Where Alfred L. Gamber Lived and Kept His
NOTE: Click on Image to Enlarge.
* * * * *
"SERIES OF CROWS, YELPS, ODORS IRK PELHAM WOMEN
-----
Quintet Prays Village Board to Do Something about 'Menagerie' of Neighbor, Complaining of Sleepless Nights and Much General Annoyance
-----
NORTH PELHAM. Sept. 13. -- A rooster that crows for 40 minutes straight at dawn, bird dogs that rend the night with their yelps, pigeons that behave like pigeons and a hen yard with its traditional odor were on the mat last night at a Village Board meeting.
These combine to constitute an insufferable nuisance in a Maple Avenue section of Chester Park, five irate woman householders told the board.
Defending the bird-dogs, a litter of pups, the pigeons, the hens and the vociferous rooster, was their owner, Alfred L. Gamber, 16 Maple Avenue, executive secretary of the Board of Education.
The five angry women neighbors had fire in their eyes and in their voices as individually they told of sleepless nights, charging them up to the pedigreed Rhode Island Red boss of the chicken yard, disagreeable odors and general annoyance from barking dogs and visits of pigeons.
Rooster Up Early
The women want a stop put to the whole business by the Village Board. There was a certain 'or else' quality to their grimness.
The complaining women were Mrs. J. K. Clarke, 25 Linden Avenue; Mrs. Herbert Zobel, 18 Maple Avenue; Mrs. Carl Becker, 15 Linden Avenue; Mrs. L. Gates, 19 Linden Avenue and Mrs. Harold Ring, 12 Maple Avenue.
Mrs. Clarke declaring that the rooster sounds off every morning without fail and sometimes makes his solo last 40 minutes, said she wants to sell or rent her house but can't do either because of the neighboring live stock.
All of the complaining women told the board that 'terrific' best described the odor from the hen-yard.
The five women scoffed in chorus when Gamber produced two friends to testify to the inoffensive character of his place.
Michigan Neighbor
When Gamber offered Rose Fife as a witness, board members asked if he lived close enough to the Gamber home to offer an opinion.
'He lives in Michigan,' said one of the women, and they all five let forth peals of laughter.
Somewhat confused, Fife, started to explain that he had a Michigan license on his car but that he did not live there.
Board members interrupted his testimony as irrelevant, because he dwelt on such things as sportsmanship, the value of Gamber's pedigreed Irish and English setters, and allied subjects.
Gamber pointed out to the board that he had kept chickens since 1926 and that for eight years his neighbors had not kicked. Now they kick, he maintained, on the dogs alone.
The board deferred action but indicated it would consider the adopting of a prohibitive ordinance in executive session."
Source: SERIES OF CROWS, YELPS, ODORS IRK PELHAM WOMEN -- Quintet Prays Village Board to Do Something about 'Menagerie' of Neighbor, Complaining of Sleepless Nights and Much General Annoyance, The Daily Argus [Mount Vernon, NY], Sep. 13, 1934, p. 9, cols. 2-3.
"Chester Park Dispute About Dogs And Chickens Is Carried To Village Board
-----
Beleaguered Trustees Listen to Argument About Animals and Fowl in Residential District.
-----
Can breeding pedigreed dogs and raising chickens and pigeons within the residential district of North Pelham be classed as 'sporting' or is it just a plain nuisance?
That was the subject of controversy at the meeting of the beleaguered North Pelham Board of Trustees on Wednesday night. Five Chester Park women declared that their lives were being made miserable by barking dogs, crowing roosters, and offensive odors which they claimed emanated from the property of Alfred L. Gamber, whose home is at No. 16 Maple avenue. Mr. Gamber is the clerk to the Board of Education. He denied all their contentions, declaring that he raised a few puppies as a hobby and that his chickens were no more annoying than the fowl of several other residents of the village.
After listening to arguments and cross-talk for almost two hours, Mayor Eugene L. Lyon announced that the board would consider the adoption of an ordinance regulating the keeping of animals and fowl within the village limits.
The complainants, all nearby residents were Mrs. Harold S. Ring, of No. 12 Maple avenue; Mrs. J. K. Clark of No. 25 Linden avenue; Mrs. H. Zobel of No. 18 Maple avenue; Mrs. Mabel Gates of No. 19 Linden avenue; and Mrs. Edith Becker of No. 15 Linden avenue.
They see Mr. Gamber's interest in dogs and fowl as a business, in violation of the zoning ordinance. They charged him with selling dogs and eggs and pointed to an advertisement in a New York newspaper offering puppies for sale. The told the Board also that he had sold eggs.
'We tried to buy some one eggs and he told us that he had only enough for his Pelham Manor customers,' said one of the complainants.
His rooster starts to crow every morning at 3 o'clock,' said another.
'And his dogs howl all day long.'
'--and the odor from the place
(Continued on Page 7)
CHESTER PARK'S DISPUTE BEFORE VILLAGE BOARD
-----
(Continued from Page One)
is terrific.'
'He has two dozen pigeons in one little coop. I cannot sell or rent my property because of this nuisance.'
'I called the police and I got no satisfaction.' These were just a few of the remarks.
In response, Mr. Gamber denied that he was commercializing his property. 'I am breeding fine hunting dogs because I love dogs. I am not breeding them for sale,' he said. 'It seems funny to me that although I have kept chickens since 1926 no one has complained until now.'
He said that his place had recently been inspected by the county health department, and it was approved.
Gamber offered the testimony of friends to show that he had a sportsman's interest instead of a business interest in raising dogs.
The trustees discussed the possibility of passing an ordinance regulating the harboring of dogs and fowl in the village. Gamber said he would be willing to get rid of his chickens if others in the village did likewise. The matter of adopting an ordinance will be discussed at a meeting next Thursday night."
Source: Chester Park Dispute About Dogs And Chickens Is Carried To Village Board -- Beleaguered Trustees Listen to Argument About Animals and Fowl in Residential District, The Pelham Sun, Sep. 14, 1934, Vol. 25, No. 26, p. 1, cols. 7-8 & p. 7, col. 4.
"COMPANIONS IN MISERY
Crowing roosters, yelping hounds, and fluttering pigeons have caused North Pelham officials to scratch their heads in bewilderment over a problem, simpler but very similar to one that has aged many a Mount Vernon office holder.
'How can we rid the community of 'noisy' animals and birds and still satisfy animal and bird lovers?' is what the Village Board members are asking themselves.
For 20 years Mount Vernon's civic leaders have asked themselves the same thing when indignant residents demanded that grackles be driven from the city.
The otherwise peaceful village housewives have taken to the warpath because Alfred L. Gamber, executive secretary of the Board of Education,
keeps dogs, hens, roosters and pigeons -- (and they all have pedigrees.)
'Pedigrees or no pedigrees, they must go,' was the housewives' ultimatum.
But the Village Board's problem is nothing compared to Mount Vernon's.
Should the board members decide Mr. Gamber's pets create a nuisance, one single ordinance would be the solution -- although Mr. Gamber might not like it.
All Mount Vernon officials should join in passing a 'super-law' and the grackles would still make Mount Vernon their Summer home."
Source: COMPANIONS IN MISERY, The Daily Argus [Mount Vernon, NY], Sep. 17, 1934, p. 6, col. 1.
"Anti-Noise Ordinance Adopted to Make North Pelham Quiet Village
-----
North Pelham, Peaceful village.
That is the hope of the board of trustees who last night adopted an ordinance directed against off-key sounds of the type that can be classed as noise. This means barking dogs, crowing roosters, ringing bells, grinding machinery, or any sound whatsoever that would tend to interrupt the slumbers of the villagers during the night (thus impairing their health) and any other unnecessary noises that would disturb the peace and quiet of the village during daylight hours.
The ordinance, which was prepared by Village attorney Thomas E. Fenlon, covered almost every noise but those heard at sessions of the board of trustees at which village fathers are besieged by irate citizens complaining about noise. The adoption of the ordinance followed a complaint made by Chester Park householders directed at a neighbor who is a farmer of chickens and thoroughbred dogs.
A fine of $25 or five days in jail or both is the penalty for violation of the ordinance."
Source: Anti-Noise Ordinance Adopted to Make North Pelham Quiet Village, The Pelham Sun, Sep. 21, 1934, Vol. 25, No. 27, p. 1, cols. 7-8.
"COMPLAINT SUBJECT SCANS NOISE LAWS
-----
(Special To The Argus)
NORTH PELHAM, Sept. 24. -- A copy of the newly created Village Ordinance banning maintenance of noisy fowl and other animals was served Saturday on Alfred L. Gamber, 16 Maple Avenue, against whom neighbors recently complained to the Village Board because of his hens, rooster, dogs and pigeons."
Source: COMPLAINT SUBJECT SCANS NOISE LAWS, The Daily Argus [Mount Vernon, NY], Sep. 24, 1934, p. 7, col. 3.
"FLY-BY-NIGHT MERCHANTS TO BE BARRED IN PELHAM
-----
Village Board Passes Ordinance Imposing Sales Tax and Requiring Bond on Transient Stores -- Parking Limit Reduced
-----
(Special to The Daily Argus)
NORTH PELHAM, June 20: . . .
The Gamber chicken coop at 16 Maple Avenue was given a clean bill of health by an inspector from the County Health Department. The Board asked for an inspection after receiving a complaint from H. Zobel, a neighbor of Alfred L. Gamber.
The report stated that the coop housing 14 Rhode Island and a number of pigeons was kept according to statute and violated no provisions of the Health Code."
Source: FLY-BY-NIGHT MERCHANTS TO BE BARRED IN PELHAM -- Village Board Passes Ordinance Imposing Sales Tax and Requiring Bond on Transient Stores -- Parking Limit Reduced, The Daily Argus [Mount Vernon, NY], June 20, 1935, p. 8, cols. 2-3 (unrelated text omitted).
"Gamber's 'Farm' Is Responsible For Another Ordinance In North Pelham
-----
Just as an ordinance was passed against noise a few years ago was prompted by a complaint about the 'farm' of Alfred L. Gamber of Maple avenue, secretary to the Board of Education, more complaints prompted the adoption of another ordinance in North Pelham at a meeting of the North Pelham Village Board, Wednesday night. Mrs. Harold Ring, also of Maple avenue, complained about smoke and obnoxious odors which she alleges are caused by a rubbish bonfire at the Gamber residence.
Mrs. Ring told the Board that the 'farmer' secretary to the school board harbors 76 pets, including chickens, pigeons and dogs, and although the county board of health has inspected the property and has found no violation of the health code, nevertheless she considers Gamber's animals and fowl an annoyance.
She wanted to know what could be done next.
The anti-noise ordinance passed two years ago when complaints had been made against Gamber was referred to. It was summed up briefly by Trustee James T. Bollettieri who said, 'This ordinance practically makes it a crime to be awake after 12 o'clock midnight.'
Mrs. Ring said that she was not complaining about noise, since three annoying roosters had been eliminated by culinary preparation perhaps, but against the burning of ill-smelling refuse.
'Then,' said the trustee, almost in a body, 'we'll make an ordinance against burning rubbish!'
'But will it be constitutional?' asked someone.
'Never mind about that,' replied Trustee Bollettieri. 'Everybody seems to be testing the constitutionality of laws these days. We'll make the ordinance and let somebody else test it.'
The ordinance was adopted unanimously."
Source: Gamber's 'Farm' Is Responsible For Another Ordinance In North Pelham, The Pelham Sun, Nov. 15, 1935, p. 8, col. 7.
Archive of the Historic Pelham Web Site.
Home Page of the Historic Pelham Blog.
Order a Copy of "Thomas Pell and the Legend of the Pell Treaty Oak."Labels: 16 Maple Avenue, 1934, 1935, Alfred L. Gamber, Animals, Chester Park, Chickens, Dog, Farm, Maple Avenue, Pigeons
