Historic Pelham

Presenting the rich history of Pelham, NY in Westchester County: current historical research, descriptions of how to research Pelham history online and genealogy discussions of Pelham families.

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

What Do We Know About "Cockho," a Native American Who Signed the Pell Indian Deed on June 27, 1654?


One aspect of the history of Pelham that has never been documented is the identities and backgrounds of the various Native Americans who signed the so-called "Indian Deed" by which Thomas Pell, on June 27, 1654, acquired from local Native Americans the lands that became the Manor of Pelham.  Recently, however, I have begun a research initiative to document what can be found regarding the lives of these men.  See, e.g., Fri., Jun. 15, 2018:  Who Was Shawanórõckquot, a Native American Sachem Who Signed the Pell Indian Deed on June 27, 1654?

One of the Native Americans who signed the portion of the Pell Indian Deed denoted as the "articles of agreement" (via his mark) was referenced in the document as "Cockho."  Interestingly, Cockho frequently appeared with, and signed documents also signed by, "Shawanórõckquot," the noted Wiechquaeskeck sachem.  Today's Historic Pelham Blog article documents research regarding Cockho.

The Pell Indian Deed

The Pell Indian Deed, of which an image appears below and a transcription appears at the end of today's Historic Pelham Blog article, consisted of two parts:  the deed and a section entitled "articles of agreement."  The deed, of course, conveyed to Pell much of today's Bronx and lower Westchester Counties.  Each of the two parts of the document was signed by a different group of Native Americans.  Those who signed the "articles of agreement" as "Indyan Wittnesses" included Cockho, Kamaque, and Cockinsecawa.  



17th Century Copy of the Pell Indian Deed Signed by Thomas Pell and
Native Americans on June 27, 1654 (Believed to be In Thomas Pell's
Handwriting). The Whereabouts of the Original Deed Are Unknown.
This Copy is on Display in the Thompson-Pell Research Center
Located near Fort Ticonderoga National Historic Landmark
in Ticonderoga, New York.  NOTE:  Click on Image to Enlarge.

Spelling Variants of the Name of the Native American Referenced as "Cockho"

Scholars who have worked to understand so-called "Indian Deeds" addressing lands in the region of Westchester County and the Bronx have documented references to some of the Native Americans who appear on such deeds including the Native American who signed (via his mark) Pell's Indian Deed named Cockho.  

Spelling variants of the name "Cockho" seem to include at least those listed below, distilled from a variety of references:  

Cockho (See Pell Indian Deed)
Cokeo (Baird, Chronicle of a Border Town, p. 502 n.2; Bolton, 1881, Vol. II, pp. 150-51)
Cokoe (Baird, Chronicle of a Border Town, pp. 11-12, 13-16; Bolton, 1881, Vol. II, pp. 150-53; Bolton, NYC in Indian Possession, pp. 253, 323)
Cokow (Baird, Chronicle of a Border Town, pp. 10-11; Bolton, NYC in Indian Possession, pp. 251-52, 325)
Couko (Baird, Chronicle of a Border Town, pp. 56-57)
Cowwows (Baird, Chronicle of a Border Town, p. 58; Bolton, 1881, Vol. II, pp. 134-36)

Who Was "Cockho" Who Signed the Pell Indian Deed Via His Mark?

So far research has not revealed to this author any references to Cockho prior to his name appearing on the Pell Indian Deed signed on June 27, 1654.  Within only a few years thereafter, between 1660 and 1666, Cockho was involved with Shawanórõckquot and other Native Americans in a fascinating series of so-called "Indian Deeds" that transferred massive tracts that included roughly the areas covered by the towns of Rye and Harrison, portions of the towns of North Castle and Bedford, portions of Greenwich, Connecticut, among other lands.  Most significantly, a number of the other Native American signers of various of these deeds also signed the Pell Indian Deed.

For example, on June 29, 1660, a Native American referenced as "Cokow" was among a group of Native Americans who executed a deed selling Manussing Island (today's Manursing Island off the coast of Rye) to a group of Greenwich residents.  Significantly, it appears that several of the Native Americans who signed the Pell Indian Deed with Cockho (i.e., Cokow) also signed the June 29, 1660 Manussing deed.  Below is a list with the names as they appeared on the Pell Indian Deed on the left and the phonetically similar names as they appeared on the June 29, 1660 Manussing deed on the right:

Shawanórõckquot             Shanarockwell
Cockho                              Cokow
Cockinsecawa                   Cokinseco
Kamaque                           Quaraiko
Mehúmõw                          Maowbert

Nearly a year later, on May 22, 1661, four Native Americans executed an acknowledgement confirming that "Cokoe and Marrmeukhong and Affawauwone and Nahtiweman and Shocoke and Wauwhowarnt" had sold land between the Blind Brook and the Byram River north of lands previously sold to a group of New Englanders.  The document was executed by only some of the named Native Americans:  "Marrmeukhong, Affawauwone, Nahtimeman, and Cokoe."  The Native American referenced as "Shocoke" in the document likely was Shawanórõckquot.

Thereafter, on November 8, 1661, a Native American referenced as "Cokeo" and other Native Americans executed a deed selling to John Budd, Sr. of Southold lands part of today's Rye bounded on the east by Blind Brook and on the west by Stony Brook (or Beaver Meadow Brook) and extending "northward as far as Westchester Path, and southward to the sea."  Several of the Native Americans who signed the Pell Indian Deed with Shawanórõckquot (i.e., Shanarocke) also signed this November 8, 1661 deed.  Below is a list with the names as they appeared on the Pell Indian Deed on the left and the phonetically similar names as they appeared on the November 8, 1661 Rye deed on the right:

Shawanórõckquot             Shanarocke
Cockho                             Cokeo
Kamaque                          Rawmaquaie
Cockinsecawa                   Cockenseco

Thereafter, on April 29, 1666, a group of Native Americans including one referenced as "Cokoe" executed an Indian Deed purporting to reaffirm the earlier November 8, 1661 Indian Deed.  This time the deed confirmed an earlier grant of land that extended northward into the country sixteen miles from Westchester Path.  Once again, it appears that several of the Native Americans who signed the Pell Indian Deed with Shawanórõckquot (i.e., Shonarocke and Shanarocke) also signed this April 29, 1666 confirmation of the earlier November 8, 1661 deed.  Below is a list with the names as they appeared on the Pell Indian Deed on the left and the phonetically similar names as they appeared on the November 8, 1661 Rye deed on the right:

Shawanórõckquot             Shonarocke and Shanarocke
Cockho                             Cokoe
Kamaque                          Romackqua
Poquõrúm                         Pathung

On September 4, 1680, a Native American referenced as "Couko" signed as a witness on the so-called Indian Deed by which a Native American named "Maramaking" (also known as "Will" and "Lame Will") sold a large tract in the region of today's Rye near Blind Brook.  About a year later, on October 8, 1681, Maramaking executed a second "deed' confirming the earlier sale of the tract.  This second document was witnessed by Native Americans including one referenced as "Cowwows."  This is the latest document yet revealed by research that seems to make reference to the Native American referred to in the Pell Indian Deed as "Cockho."

What may we surmise about Cockho from an analysis of these so-called "Indian Deeds" and the overlapping signers of these deeds?  

First, it seems from the various Indian Deeds he signed that Cockho was active in the region for nearly thirty years, between about 1654 and 1681.  So far, the earliest Indian Deed he seems to have signed was the Pell Indian Deed on June 27, 1654.  The last seems to have been signed on October 8, 1681.

Second, it seems that in every instance, Cockho was not represented in the deed as an owner or proprietor of the lands being sold.  Rather, in each and every instance he seems to have signed the relevant deed solely as a witness.  Indeed, in the case of the Pell Indian Deed, Cockho was listed as among three "Indyan Wittnesses" to the "articles of agreement."  This might suggest that although Cockho was not of sufficent prominence to be a designated owner / proprietor of any of the lands being sold, he was sufficiently respected and deemed sufficiently responsible to serve as a witness and signer (by his mark) of these various Indian Deeds.  

Third, as seems to have been the case with Shawanórõckquot, research suggests that Cockho's involvement with such Indian Deeds was limited to lands along the coastal area between today's Northeast Bronx and Pelham northeast to approximately Rye and Harrison near the Connecticut border.  

Fourth, the Indian Deeds signed by Cockho (using his mark) are evidence that Cockho had repeated interactions with such Native Americans who signed the Pell Indian Deed as the Wiechquaeskeck sachem Shawanórõckquot, Cockinsecawa, Kamaque, and Mehúmõw.  Given that it is indisputable that Shawanórõckquot was a Wiechquaeskeck -- not a supposed "Siwanoy" -- it seems likely that Cockho was a Wiechquaeskeck.  It should be noted in this regard that any suggestion there was a band, clan, tribe, or grouping of Native Americans that understood (or referenced) themselves to be "Wiechquaeskecks" would be misleading. The Dutch and English referenced Native Americans northeast of today's Manhattan in areas we now know as the Bronx, Pelham, and portions of Westchester County as associated with a physical location described, using various spellings, as "Wijckerscreek."  The term, widely referenced today as Wiechquaeskeck, was applied by Dutch and English (using a wide variety of spellings) to the Native Americans in the region as a shorthand reference.

Clearly on June 27, 1654 when, according to the Pell Indian Deed, "A great multitude off Indyans & many English" gathered for a ceremonial and formal signing of that deed, one of those present was a Native American referenced in the deed as Cockho.  Today's Historic Pelham Blog Article has been an effort to document a little of the life of that man.

*          *          *          *          *

TEXT OF THOMAS PELL’S COPY OF THE SO-CALLED "PELL INDIAN DEED" WHICH, ACCORDING TO TRADITION, WAS SIGNED BENEATH THE TREATY OAK THAT ONCE STOOD ON THE GROUNDS OF TODAY'S BARTOW-PELL MANSION MUSEUM

(Transcribed from High Resolution Image of the Original by Blake A. Bell)

“Know all men by this present yt we Shawanarockqúot: poquorum: Anhõõke: Wawhãmkus: Mehumõw: Beinge ye true owners & ye only Lawffull Heyres & proprietors off a piece of land Bounded by ye Sea to ye South wth yt Tract off land Called by ye English Longe Island; to ye west & west & by South wth ye bay & River & River Diawockinge Acqueonunge (Chemaqūanaock to ye East) wth all ye Islands yt are in ye salt water to ye South South East & South West Against yt Tract off Land wch is Beffore expresd; wh all trees medowes & all Land wh in ye tract off Land wch is Beffore Expressed: doo sell & deliver to Thos Pell now inhabitinge in Fayrffield his heyres & assignse to hould injoy improove plant as hee shall see cause to his Best to be improved ffor & to him & his heyres fforever wh out any molestation on our pt And doo herby ingage our Selves to make good our selves against all Claymes intayled either by Dutch or Indyans wt ever & doo deliver it into ye posession off ye sayd Thos Pell & his Assignes: markinge ye bounds to ye mayne Land wch is & shalbe ye present bounds to ye mayne Land: only Liberty is ffreely graunt ffor ffeedinge offe cattle & Cuttinge off timber beyound those Bounds; & wee doo Acknowledge to have Reseved in full for it ye trou valew & just Satisfaction Accordinge to our Estimate to wch we sett our hands beffore these wittnesses off English & Indyans this twenty seaventh off June 1654. 

English Wittnesses                       Saggamores (Markes) 
Richard Crabb Magistrate             +Shawanórõckquot 
Thomas Lawrence                        +Poquõrúm 
John Ffinch                                   +Anhõõke 
                                                      +Wawhamkus 
                                                      +Mehúmõw 


Articles of Agreement

We also as lovinge neighbours & ffriends doo mutually ingage our Selves to send too men off Each yr one Day in ye Springe every yeare to marke ye Bounds of ye Land yt a Right Knowledge may be kept wh out injury to Either side yt Mutuall peace & love may be mayntayned 2nd Wee allso doo promise Each to other if any plotts on either Side yt may be to hurt off Either yt we Seasonably Discover ym as Lovinge Neighbours & friends yt peace & love may be mutually preserved 


Indyan Wittnesses
+Marke Cockho 
+Mark Kamaque 
+Marke Cockinsecawa 

This wrightinge was signed & wittnessed Beffore A great multitude off Indyans & many English we who are under written do testify 

mark

Henry + Accorly                        This is A True Coppy off ye
William Newman                       originall written Thos Pell”

*          *          *           *          *


Native American References that May be Relevant to Cockho, the Native American Who Used His Mark to Sign the Pell Indian Deed on June 27, 1654

"This First Purchase on Peningo Neck comprised the lower part of the present town of Rye, on the east side of Blind Brook.  From the extreme end of the peninsula proper, or Brown's Point, as it has long been called, this territory extended north as far as the present village of Port Chester.  A line of marked trees from east to west was the boundary of this tract, beginning a little below Park's Mill, where a branch of Blind Brook empties into that stream, and running in a southeasterly direction to Byram River.

Nearly six months elapsed before any further step was taken by our planters.  They had no intention of settling, as yet, on the land thus acquired upon the main.  But east of Peningo Neck, separated from it only by a narrow channel, lay an island about a mile in length, called by the Indians Manussing.  This island appears not to have been included in the first purchase.  It offered manifest advantages for the commencement of the plantation.  On the twenty-ninth day of June, 1660, Peter Disbrow, with John Coe and Thomas Stedwell, concluded a treaty with the Indian proprietors for the purchase of this islande.  The deed is as follows: -- 

'Be it knowen vnto all men whom it may concern both Indians and English that we Shanarockwell sagamore, Maowhobo and Cokensekoo have sold unto Peter Disbro, John Coo, Thomas Studwell, all living at the present at Grenwige, to say a certain parcel of land the parcel of land which these Indians above mentioned have sold is called in the Indian name Peningo.  This said island we above mentioned doe here by virtue of this bill doe sell all our right and title unto John Coo, Peter Disbro, Thomas Studwell, quietly to injoy  from any molestation of us or any other Indians to them and to their heirs, assigns and executors for ever, and farther we have given unto Peter Disbro John Coo and Thomas Studwell feed for their cattle upon the main called by the Indians Peningo and what timbers or trees that is for their use and not to be molested by us or other Indians:  and we doe hereby acknowledge to have received full satisfaction for this purchase of land above mentioned to saya we have received full satisfaction for this purchase of land above mentioned to say we have received eight cotes and seven shirts fiftene fathom of wompone which is the full satisfaction for the parcel of land above mentioned and for the witness we have hereto set our hands.

[Right Column]

SHANAROCKWELL
ARANAQUE
COKOW
WAWATANMAN
COKINSECO
MAOWBERT
QUARAIKO.'

[Left Column]

IPAWAHUN
ARAMAPOE
WONANAO
TOPOGONE
MATISHES
RICHARD

Source:  Baird, Charles W., Chronicle of a Border Town -- History of Rye Westchester County, New York 1660-1870 Including Harrison and the White Plains Till 1788pp. 10-11 (NY, NY:  Anson D. F. Randolph and Company, 1871).  

"By these two treaties, our settlers acquired the lower half of the present territory of the town, between Blind Brook and the Sound or Byram River; together with the adjoining island of Manussing.  Nearly a year after, they bought the land lying farther north, between the same streams.  This included considerably more than the present territory of the town.  The deed of the purchase is dated May 22, 1661: --

'Be it known to all men whom it may concern both English and Indians that I Cokoe and Marrmeukhong and Affawauwone and Nahtimenman and Shocoke and Wauwhowarnt do acknowledge to have sold to Peter Disbrow, his heirs and assigns, a certain tract of land lying between Byram River and the Blind Brook, which tract of land is bounded as followeth, viz., with the river called in English Byram River beginning at the mouth of the above said river on the east and the bounds of Hsting on the south and southwest to the marked trees, and northward up to the marked trees; which may contain six or seven miles from the sea along the said Byram River side northward, and so from the said river cross the neck northwest and west to the river called the Blind Brook, bounded northward with marked trees whjich leads down to a little brook which runs into the Blind Brook.  The which tract of land I Cokoe and the above said Indians our fellows, heirs and assigns, do here promise and make good to the said Peter Disbrow, his heirs or assigns, peaceable and quiet possession for ever without any molestation either from Dutch, Indians or English.  We the above said Indians have also sold this tract of land above mentioned with all the trees, grass, springs and minerals, with feed range and timber northward twenty English miles above the said purchase of land; and do acknowledge to have received full satisfaction for the said land.  In witness hereof we the above said Indians have set to our hands this present day and date above written.

MARRMEUKHONG his mark
AFFAWAUWONE his mark
NAHTINMEMAN his mark
COKOE his mark'"

Source:  Baird, Charles W., Chronicle of a Border Town -- History of Rye Westchester County, New York 1660-1870 Including Harrison and the White Plains Till 1788pp. 11-12 (NY, NY: Anson D. F. Randolph and Company, 1871).

"The lands west of the Blind brook, called by the Indians Apawamis, are to be distinguished from the rest of the township of Rye as constituting a distinct Patent, called Budd's Neck Patent.  This territory, which was 'bounded on the east by Blind brook, on the west by the little stream whose Indian name was Pockcotessewake, since known as Stony brook, or Beaver Meadow brook, and extending northward as far as Westchester Path, and southward to the sea,' was purchased of the native sachem Shanarocke and other Indians by John Budd, of Southhold, Long Island, who now takes the lead instead of Peter Disbrow, the first English grantee, under the sachems of Poningoe.

INDIAN DEED OF APAWAMIS.

To all Christian people, Ingains [i.e., Indians] and others whom it may concern, that we, whose names are hereunto subscribed, living upon Hudson's river, in America, that we, Shanarocke, sagamore, and Rackceate, Napockheast, Tawwheare, Nanderwhere, Tomepawcon, Rawmaquaie, Pawaytahem, Mawmawytom, Howhoranes, Cockkeneco, Tawwayco, Attoemacke, Heattomeas, all Ingains, for divers good causes and considerations us hereunto moving, have fully and absolutely bargained, and doe for ever sell unto John Budd, senior, of Southhole, his heires, executors, &c., all our real right, tittell and interest we or eather of us have in one track of land lying on the mayn, called Apawammeis, buted and bounded on the east with Mockquams river, and on the south with the sea against Long Island, and on the west with Pockcotessec river, and at the north up to the marke trees nyeer Westchester Path, all the lands, trees to fell at his pleasure, with all the grounds, and meadow grounds and planting grounds, moynes and mineraals, springs and rivers, or what else lying or being within the said track of land, and also range, feeding and grasse for cattell, twenty English miles northward into the country, and trees to fell at his or their pleasure, and to their proper use and improvements of the said John Budd, his heirs, executors, &c., for ever to enjoy, possess and keep as their real right, as also peaceably to inherite the sayd track of land with all thereon, and we, the before named Ingains, doe acknowledge and confesse to have received in hand of the said John Budd, the juste sum of eightie pounds sterling in full satisfaction for the aforesaid land with all the limits, bounds and privileges with hegrece and regrece, without lett or molesttion of any one.  Now for the more true and reall enjoyment and possession of the said John Budd, his heirs, &c., we doe jointly and severally, us and either of us, or any by and under us, for ever assign and make over by virtue of this, our deed and bill of sale, disclayme any further right in the sayd tract of land from the day of the date hereof, and all and each of us do promise to put the said John Budd or his into quiet, peaceable possession, and him to keep and defend and mayntaine against all person or persons whatsoever that shall directly or indirectly lay any clayme or former grant, or shall trouble or molest the said John Budd or his, be they English or Dutch, or Ingains, or whatsoever.  We the aforenamed Ingains doe engage ourselves, heirs, executors, &c., to make good this our obligations as aforesaid.  I Shanarocke, Rackeate, Mepockheast, Tawwaheare, Nanderwhere, Tomepawcon, Rawmaquaie, Pawwaytahem, Mawmawytom, Howhoranes, Cockkeneco, Tawwayen, Attoemacke, Heattomees, have hereunto set our hands at tine and ties, and we doe approve of each of our hands to this deed to be good and firm.  Witness this our hands this day being the 8th of November, 1661.

Signed, sealed and delivered,

THOMAS REVELL,
JOHN COE, 
THOMAS CLOSE,
HUMPHREY HUGES, 

The mark of

SHANOROCKE,
NANDERWHERE,
MEPOCKHEAST,
HOWHORANES,
RAWMAQUAIE,
RACKEATE,
PAWWAYTAHEM,
COCKENSECO

Know all men, English and Ingains, that whereas Shanorock sold John Budd all the land from the sea to Westchester path, I Shenorock marked trees by Penning path do hereby give and grant and acknowledge that I have received full satisfaction of him, and according to the true intent of these bounds, he the sayd John Budd is to have and enjoy all the land by the Blind brook to Westchester path, witness my hand.

Witness the mark of [mark] COKEO.
PETER DISBROW.

THE MARK OF SHANOROCKE,
The mark of REMAQUAIE.

Bolton, Robert, The History of the Several Towns, Manors, and Patents of the County of Westchester, from its First Settlement to the Present Time Carefully Revised by its Author, Vol. II, pp. 150-51 (NY, NY:  Chas. F. Roper, 1881).  See also Baird, Charles W., Chronicle of a Border Town -- History of Rye Westchester County, New York 1660-1870 Including Harrison and the White Plains Till 1788, p. 502 n.2 (NY, NY: Anson D. F. Randolph and Company, 1871).

"The next year John Budd obtains a confirmation of the Indian grant of November 8th 1661, of a tract of land extending northward into the country sixteen miles from Westchester Path from the Indian Sachems Shanarocke, Romackqua and Pathung:

SECOND INDIAN DEED OF APAWAMIS.

To all Christian people, Indians and others whom it may concern that wee who's names are hereunto subscribed living upon Hudson's River in America, Shonarocke Sagemore, and Romackqua and Pathung, whereas wee have formerly sold a tract of land unto Mr. John Budd, senior, bounded on the sea by the South, on the North by Westchester path and the name of the tract of land is commonly call Apauamiss, and whereas wee have sold unto the sayd Mr. John Budd twenty English miles northwards from the above said tract, which is called by Apauamis the above said twenty English miles wee doe acknowledge that wee have sold unto Mr. John Budd for range, for feed, for timber, for grasing, to him and his heirs forever, and now wee doe acknowledge that wee have bargained, sold and delivered, wee and every one of us from our Heirs, Executors or Assigns a tract of land lying within the compass of the above sayd twenty English miles bounded on the south by Westchester path and on the East by the Blind Brook and on the West by Mamaraneck River and the north bounds is sixteen miles (English miles) from Westchester path up into the country, for which land we have received already in hand a certaine sume to the value of twenty pounds sterling for the above sayd track of land, for which land we are fully satisfied by the sayd John Budd for the above sayd track of land for the which wee doe acknowledge wee have bargained, sold and delivered unto John Budd and His Heirs forever with warrantie against all men, English, Dutch, and Indians and doe give him full possession and promise so to keep him to the which bargaine and agreement wee have hereunto set our hands this day, being the 29th of April, 1666.

Witness, JOSEPH HORTON,
Witness, JOHN RAWLS,

The mark of COKOE the Indian, 

The mark of SHANAROCKE,
The mark of ROMACKQUA,
     a sachems Son,
The mark of PATHUNG.

Recorded May 10, 1673, in the public records of ye book ffol 32, pme, Jno. Allyn, secretary [Footnote a:  "a  Baird's Hist. of Rye, p. 15."]  A true copie compared by Edward Colier.  [Footnote b:  "b  New York Col. MSS. Land papers, 1642-1681, vol. I. p. 10, Col. Rec. of Conn., vol. (MS.) p. 324."]"

Source:  Bolton, Robert, The History of the Several Towns, Manors, and Patents of the County of Westchester, from its First Settlement to the Present Time Carefully Revised by its Author, Vol. II, pp. 150-51 (NY, NY:  Chas. F. Roper, 1881).  See also Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New York, Vol. XIII Old Series & Vol. II, New Series, pp. 402-03 (Albany, NY:  Weed, Parsons and Co., 1881); Baird, Charles W., Chronicle of a Border Town -- History of Rye Westchester County, New York 1660-1870 Including Harrison and the White Plains Till 1788pp. 13-16 (NY, NY: Anson D. F. Randolph and Company, 1871).

"In the fall of the year 1680, Robert Bloomer and others, in behalf of the Proprietors of Peningo Neck, bought of Maramaking or Lame Will a certain tract of land 'called by the Indians Eaukecaupacuson and by the English name the Hogg penn ridge.' [Footnote 2:  "2  Town Records, vol. B p. xiii."]

'To all Christian peopelle to whom these shall com greeting know yee that I Marramaking Commonly called by the English Will have for a valuabelle consideration by me allradi Recaifed of Robart blomer haccaliah Brown and thomas merit alinated and sould unto them the said Rob t blomer, Haccaliah brown and thomas merit them their heirs executars administratars or asignes a certain trackt of Land Lyeing by a brooke commonly called blind brook which tract of Land is called by the Indians Eauketaupacuson bounded as followeth beginning at the southermost end which is betwene the above said brook and a branch thereof and from thence to the great swomp at the oulld marked tree which is now new marked with these Letters R B H T M and from thence by marked trees to a small Runn which Runs into the above said brook and there is marked with a mark the which tract of Land is called by the English name the hoggpenn Ridge to have and to howlld the above said trackt of land for ever and I the said Maramaking alice Will doe bind by sellfe my heires execators and administratars firmly by these presents to warrant and make good the above said salle unto the above said Robart blomer, Brown and merit their heirs exceutars administrators or asignes without any Lett hindrance molistation or trouble from or by any person or persons whatsoever that shall from or after the date hereof make or lay any claim or claims theare unto  In witnes here of I have set to my hand this 4th Day of september in the yere 1680.

Witnes the mark of COUKO

The mark of MARAMAKING alis WILL

the mark of OWROWWOAHAK

JOHN OGDEN
JOHN STOKHAN

'Maramaking alise Will hath acknliged this bill of salle before me in Rye this 28 of november 1680.

JOSEPH HORTON Commissoner

'Know all men by these presents that wee Robert Blomer, Hacaliah Brown and thomas merit doe asigne over all our Right titel and Intrust of this within written bill of salle to the propriatars of peningo neck.  as witness our hnds this second day of march in the year sixtene hundred eight one wee three above said Reserving our equall portions with the other propriatars above said.

Delivered in presence Of us JOHN GEE
His marke JOSEPH GALLPEN

ROBART BLOMER
HACKALIAH BROWN
THOMAS MERIT.'

Lame Will's Purchase commenced at a point where the 'branch' of Blind Brook joins the main stream.  From thence the southern boundary ran eastward to 'the old marked trees' at 'the Great Swamp.' [Footnote 1:  "The Great Swamp extended over a considerable part of the region bounded on the east by King Street and on the west by the Ridge Road, north of the present Roman Catholic Cemetery.  In 1705, Deliverance Brown sold to George Kniffin four or five acres of swamp land, bounded west or northwesterly 'by a branch of Blind Brook that runs out of the great Swamp commonly so called.' (Town Records, vol. C. p. 275.)"]  Northward, it extended along Blind Brook to certain other marked trees, where the line now divides the town of Rye from that of North Castle.  [Footnote 2:  "In the papers relating to the patent of the town of Rye in 1720, it appears that the territory for which that patent was sought and granted, was coextensive with Will's Purchase."]  This was Lame Will's tract, and a very valuable one it wsa.  But either the old Indian flew again from his bargain, or he was anxious to effect a more extensive sale of lands under his sway.  For a few weeks later, November 28, 1680, we find the town appointing Peter Disbrow, together with the three men previously sent, 'for to go with the Indians to view some land lying between the Blind brook and Byram river, and to make a thorow bargain with them if they shall see it best.'  [Footnote 3:  "3  Rye Records, Vol. A.  Bolton's History of Westchester County, ii. 24."]  Nearly a year elapsed before the contract was concluded.  The second purchase from Maramaking was effected on the 8th of October, 1681.  For the valuable consideration of 'three coats received,' Lame Will sold to the inhabitants of Rye a tract of land 'between Byram river and the Blind brook' or 'Houge;' [Footnote 4:  "4  Town Records, vol. B. p. xv.  The name Houge may have been applied to the upper part of Blind Brook, or to the branch alreaday referred to.  The Indians, it is well known, often had various names for the same stream."] apparently lying north of the prceding purchase, and within the present limits of North Castle.

'Know all Christian People to whom these shall com greting know ye that I maramaking Comanly called by the english will have for a valuabell Consideration by the inhabitance of the towne of Rye allradi Resaived namely, three cotse In hand of the inhabitants of Rye by me Resaived  I Maramaking doe acknolidg that I have aLinated covinanted soulld and deLivired unto them the inhabitants of Rye to them theare heirs Execetars administratars or asignes a sartain tract of Land Liing betwene Biram river and the blind brooke or honge:  acording as it is allradi marked by the Indians and bounded : : to have and holld the above said trackt of Land for ever : and I the said maramaking or else Will doe bind my sellfe my heires execetars and administratars firmly by these presents to warant and make good the above said salle unto the above named Inhabitants of Rye to them thaire heires execetars asignes or administratars without any Let hindrance moListation or trouble from or by any person or persons what so ever that shall from or after the date here of make or Lay any claim or claims theare unto  In witness here of I have set to my hand this 8th of Octobar in the yere 1681

The marke of MARAMAKING or elce WILL

Witness the mark of WESSACONOW
the mark of COWWOWS
the mark of PUMMetum

JOSHUA KNOAP
JACOB PAIRS

'Maramaking or else will hath acknowliged this bill of salle before me in Rye this 8 of october 1681

JOSEPH HORTON Commissioner."

Source:  Baird, Charles W., Chronicle of a Border Town -- History of Rye Westchester County, New York 1660-1870 Including Harrison and the White Plains Till 1788pp. 56-58 (NY, NY: Anson D. F. Randolph and Company, 1871).  See also Bolton, Robert, The History of the Several Towns, Manors, and Patents of the County of Westchester, from its First Settlement to the Present Time Carefully Revised by its Author, Vol. II, pp. 134-36 (NY, NY: Chas. F. Roper, 1881).

*          *          *          *          *


Other Secondary Source Native American References that May be Relevant to Cockho, the Native American Who Used His Mark to Sign the Pell Indian Deed on June 27, 1654

The Following References to “Cokoe,” Cokeo, and “Cocow” May Be Significant: 

“The next Siwanoy sale was of far-reaching character, and it was also of importance in linking the evidences of Siwanoy ownership. It comprised the township of Mamaroneck which was sold to John Richbell in 1666 by Wompoqueum, Cokoe, and others. Cokoe, or ‘The Owl,’ was the Poningo brave who had taken part in the sale of Rye in 1660 and Harrison in 1661, and thus connects the tribal ownership of the two tracts.” Bolton, Reginald Pelham, New York City in Indian Possession in INDIAN NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS, Vol. II, No. 7, pp. 219, 253 (NY, NY: Museum of The American Indian Heye Foundation 1920) (One of A Series of Publications Relating to the American Aborignes). 

“COKOE (probably meaning ‘The Owl’).—A Siwanoy of Rye, who took part in a number of sales of territory, connecting the relations of the Shore natives with those of the interior. Thus he appears with chief Shonarocke in the sale of Rye and Manursing island, with Lame Will in the deeds for the Harrison tracts, and as Cokee the Indian he was witness to a confirmatory deed in 1666 in the presence of his old chief as well as chief Patthunk, and the same year with Wompoquem in the sale of Mamaroneck with its interior territory.” Bolton, Reginald Pelham, New York City in Indian Possession in INDIAN NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS, Vol. II, No. 7, pp. 219, 323 (NY, NY: Museum of The American Indian Heye Foundation 1920) (One of A Series of Publications Relating to the American Aborignes). 

“Siwanoy Sales.—In 1660, Shonarocke, the sachem of Poningo (the present Rye [29]) sold the island of Manursing and the shorefront between Byram river and Blind river, and the following year disposed of the promontory between Blind river and Mamaroneck river, the latter including the inland territory for sixteen miles. These sales covered not only the townships of Rye and part of Harrison, but extended far into the possessions of other chieftains in North Castle and even into New Castle. The authority of Shonarock was extensive, as we find by his appearance in the sale of West Farms in 1663. In these sales he was joined by other Indians named Cokow and Aranaque, and in an additional deed of 1661 the former was associated with Maramaking, or Lame Will, a sachem who controlled the upland territory in Harrison.” Bolton, Reginald Pelham, New York City in Indian Possession in INDIAN NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS, Vol. II, No. 7, pp. 219, 251-52 (NY, NY: Museum of The American Indian Heye Foundation 1920) (One of A Series of Publications Relating to the American Aborignes). 

“OWROWWOAHAK.—A party, in 1680, to the deed for Eucataupucuson (Harrison), with Lame Will and Cokoe.” “Siwanoy Sales.—In 1660, Shonarocke, the sachem of Poningo (the present Rye [29]) sold the island of Manursing and the shorefront between Byram river and Blind river, and the following year disposed of the promontory between Blind river and Mamaroneck river, the latter including the inland territory for sixteen miles. These sales covered not only the townships of Rye and part of Harrison, but extended far into the possessions of other chieftains in North Castle and even into New Castle. The authority of Shonarock was extensive, as we find by his appearance in the sale of West Farms in 1663. In these sales he was joined by other Indians named Cokow and Aranaque, and in an additional deed of 1661 the former was associated with Maramaking, or Lame Will, a sachem who controlled the upland territory in Harrison.” Bolton, Reginald Pelham, New York City in Indian Possession in INDIAN NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS, Vol. II, No. 7, pp. 219, 325 (NY, NY: Museum of The American Indian Heye Foundation 1920) (One of A Series of Publications Relating to the American Aborignes).

Archive of the Historic Pelham Web Site.
Home Page of the Historic Pelham Blog.
Order a Copy of "The Haunted History of Pelham, New York"
Order a Copy of "Thomas Pell and the Legend of the Pell Treaty Oak."

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 31, 2007

Research Regarding Anhooke, One of the Native Americans Who Signed the Treaty by Which Thomas Pell Acquired Lands That Became the Manor of Pelham


Eight Native Americans signed the document known as Thomas Pell's "Treaty" on June 27, 1654. Five of those Native Americans signed that portion of the document by which Thomas Pell acquired the lands that became known as the Manor of Pelham using their "marks". Listed as "Saggamores" (sachems), the five were: Shawanórõckquot, Poquõrúm, Anhõõke, Wawhamkus, and Mehúmõw. (For an image of the treaty and its transcription, click here). Three additional Native Americans signed that portion of the treaty labeled the "Articles of Agreement" whereby the parties agreed mutually to preserve "peace & love", to reveal to each other any plots intended to harm the other and to send men out one day each Spring to re-mark the boundaries of the lands acquired by Pell. Those three Native Americans were designated "Indyan Wittnesses" and were: Cockho, Kamaque and Cockinsecawa.

Little is known about these eight Native Americans. Many legends have arisen regarding one of them: Anhõõke. After years of inquiry and research, I have come to the firm conclusion that many of these legends are unfounded.

Anhõõke has been described as the Siwanoy who murdered Anne Hutchinson in 1643. At the time he supposedly was known as Wampage and allegedly took the name "Anhõõke" to pay homage to his notorious deed of killing Anne Hutchinson. It appears to me that Wampage was an Algonquian Patriot and that Anhõõke was an entirely different Native American.

In his history of Westchester County first published in 1848 and reissued in a second edition (1881) and a third edition (1905), Robert Bolton, Jr. seems to be the first author to claim in print that Anhõõke and Wampage were one and the same. (I am not convinced that the two were one and the same. I recognize, however, that several academics have concluded that the two were the same.) Bolton wrote:

"The residence of Anne Hutchinson appears to have been situated on Pelham neck [sic], formerly called Ann's hoeck, literally, Ann's point or neck, hoeck being a Dutch name for a neck or point, for, up to a very late period, her farm was distinguished as the Manor of Anne hooks neck. A small stream that separates this town from Eastchester on the west still retains her surname Hutchinson's river. One of the principal Indian proprietors of this territory also assumed her christian surname, as we find it recorded in the early deeds, Ann-hoock alias Wampage. This individual may have taken an active part in the destruction of Mrs. Hutchinson, for nothing was more common among the Indians than for a warrior to assume the name of his victim."

Source: Bolton, Jr., Robert, A History of the County of Westchester From its First Settlement to the Present Time, Vol. 1, p. 515 (NY, NY: Alexander S. Gould 1848).


Other historians have questioned portions of the legend. See, e.g., Ultan, Lloyd, The Bronx in the Frontier Era, p. 196 (Bronx, NY: Bronx Historical Society 1994) ("Wampage was also known as Ann-Hooke. Several authors assume that he was the man who killed Anne Hutchinson and took her name. Without documentary evidence, this must remain speculation.").

The tradition that Anhõõke and Wampage were the same person has become ingrained, although there seems to be conflicting evidence regarding whether they were, in fact, the same person. Today's Historic Pelham Blog posting begins the process of assembling research on the Native American known as Anhõõke. Manny have researched this before. Now I hope to document such research so others will not "reinvent the wheel", so to speak.

References Purporting to Provide General Information About Anhõõke

Robert Bolton, Jr.'s second edition of the history of Westchester County was published in 1881, shortly after the author's death. In it, Bolton described Anhõõke as follows:

"One of the principal Indian proprietors of this territory, who sold to Thomas Pell in 1654, just eleven years after the above mentioned massacre, assumed Mrs. Hutchinson's Christian name ; for he constantly styled himself in the early deeds 'Ann-hoock,' alias Wampage. This [image of "An hoock AH his mark"] individual may have taken an active part in the destruction of Anne Hutchinson, for nothing was more common among the Indians than for a warrior or brave to assume the name of his victim -- material traces of his existence still linger around the scene of this bloody tragedy, for his grave or mound is still pointed out, and there is also a rock upon the south side of the neck bearing the same name, which is said to have been a favorite fishing place of the above mentioned sachem. Towards the extreme point of the neck, sometimes called Rodman's Point (after Samuel Rodman who married Mary, grand-daughter of Thomas Pell, third proprietor of the manor) quite near the waters' edge is located an ancient burying ground, said to have been used by the Indians ; but a thorough examination, conducted in the presence of Thomas Pell, fifth in descent from John Lord Pell, proved it to be a place of sepulture for the white race only -- how far back it is impossible to say. The first mound opened contained the skull and larger bones of a female skeleton in a horizontal position."

Source: Bolton, Jr., Robert, The History of the Several Towns, Manors and Patents of the County of Westchester, From Its First Settlement to the Present Time Carefully Revised by Its Author, Vol. II, p. 33 (C.W. Bolton, ed., Chas. F. Roper pub. 1881) (hereinafter "Bolton 1881").

Early References to "Anne Hook's" Neck (or Other Such References)


There are a number of late 17th century references to the area known today as Rodman's Neck suggesting that the area was associated with, visited by, or once owned by Anhõõke. [More here]

According to Bolton in his 1881 edition, there was a very early reference to "Ann Hook's Neck" recorded in connection with an order to inventory Thomas Pell's estate following his death in late September 1669. Bolton wrote:

"This 3d of ------ [Must be October], in his Majestie's Colony of Connecticut, September, 1669, a [Footnote a states "a This will may be found in the Probate Rec. of Fairfield Co., 1665 to '75, vol. ii, p. 43-44. Also Surrogates office N. Y. Wills and Adm., 1665 to 1683, vol. i9., p. 83."]

Upon the 13th of October, A. D. 1669, the Court of Assize issued the [Page 45 / Page 46] following order, authorizing and appointing Mr. John Richbell, Mr. William Leyden, and mr. Samuel Drake, to take an inventory of the estate of Thomas Pell, deceased:

'Whereas Mr. Thomas Pell, of Ann Hook's Neck, is lately deceased, and having left a considerable estate in this government, of which no inventory is as yet returned.' a [Footnote a states "a Assize Rec. Albany, vol. ii. 78."]".

Source: Bolton 1881, Vol. II, pp. 45-46.

Bolton also wrote in his 1881 edition about events on "Anne Hook's Neck" in 1675. He wrote:

"In 1675 the Indians must have been still residing on the neck in considerable numbers for at a General Court of assize held the same year in New York, it was resolved, 'that the Indyans at Mr. Pell's or Anne Hook's Neck, be ordered to remove to their usual winter quarters, within Hell Gate, upon this island ; and further, that all canoes belonging to Christians or Indyans on the north side of Long Island to the east of Hell Gate shall be (within three days from the publication of this order) brought to the next towns and delivered to the constables to be secured near the Hook house ; any canoes found upon the sound after that time to be destroyed.' 'This order is said to have ben made to prevent the Indians of Long Island joining King Philip against New England.' b [Footnote b cites "Dunlap's Hist. of N. Y., vol. ii., appendix cxxiii."]

Near the entrance of Pellam [sic] neck, is situated the favorite burying ground of the Siwanoy's tribe, to which the Indians were in the habit of bringing their dead over from Greenwich for interment. Numerous mounds are still visible near the water's edge, on the Rapelyea estate. Two of the largest mounds are pinted out as the sepulchres of the Siwanoy's sachems, Ann-hook and Nimham ; both of whom are said to have lived to advanced ages. c [Footnote c cites "Nimham, sachem of Miereckacky occurs in 1669."]

The former was opened some years since, and found to contain a large sized skeleton, by the side of which lay the stone axe and flint spear head of the tenant of the grave. We have carefully examined several mounds near the waters edge; one of these held the remains of an Indian boy about twelve years old, in a sitting position, together with a beautiful specimen of native pottery formed by the hand alone, rudely ornamented with zigzag lines, in which we discovered an arrow head of [Page 36 / Pag3 37] quartz and the bones of a small animal. This practice of burying their favorite utensils and weapons with the deceased, is known to be an ancient Indian custom. By way of accounting for the numerous mounds which occur so close to the waters edge, on the north-east side of the neck, it is said that the small-pox was introduced among the Indians through the medium of blankets, and that when they applied for a remedy they were told to bathe in the salt water which proved almost instant death to hundreds. Near the residence of the late L. R. Marshall, the remains of an Indian were found in a very perfect state of preservation with a gun by his side. On the extreme point of this beautiful neck which commands the magnificent scenery of Hutchinson's Bay, lies another Indian cemetery."

Source: Bolton 1881, Vol. II, pp. 36-37.

Anhõõke Allegedly Confirmed the Ownership Rights of Inhabitants of the Town of East Chester in 1666

In the second edition of his History of Westchester County published in 1881, Bolton claimed that in 1666 "Anhooke" and other Native Americans confirmed the ownership rights of the inhabitants of the Town of East Chester. Bolton wrote:

"Upon the 14th of November, 1654 [sic], Thomas Pell obtained a second grant from the aboriginal proprietors, which also embraced the present township. Twelve years later we find the inhabitants of East Chester confirmed in all their rights by the Mohegan Sachems, Gramatan, Woariatapus, Annhooke, (alias Wampage,) and Porrige."

Source: Bolton, Jr., Robert, The History of the Several Towns, Manors and Patents of the County of Westchester, From Its First Settlement to the Present Time Carefully Revised by Its Author, Vol. I, p. 201 (C.W. Bolton, ed., Chas. F. Roper pub. 1881).

Bolton also wrote later in the same book as follows: "In 1666, the inhabitants of Eastchester obtained a further grant from the native Indians, Ann-hooke and others. This sale was confirmed by royal patent the same year". Id., p. 205.


See also Jenkins, Stephen, The Story of the Bronx from the Purchase Made by the Dutch from the Indians in 1639 to the Present Day, p. (NY, NY: G. P. Putnam's Sons 1912) ("The settlement became known as the 'Ten Farms,' and later, as Eastchester, because it lay to the eastward of Westchester. In 1666, the settlers bought more land from the Indians, who confirmed, at the same time, the previous sale of 1654 to Pell. The Mohegan sachems who signed the deed were Gramatan, Woariatapus, Annhooke (alias Wampage), and Porrige. The sachem Wampage, or Annhooke, was probably the slayer of Mrs. Hutchinson, as it was not unusual among the aborigines to assume the name of the slain, due probably, to a superstitious belief that by so doing the dead would be propitiated or that the good qualities of the slain, especially courage, would enter into the slayer.").

Wampage, Who Some Have Said Was the Alias of Anhõõke, Conveyed Land East of Bronx River in 1684

Robert Bolton, Jr. included an unsupported reference in his second edition of the History of Westchester County published in 1881 suggesting that Wampage (whom many claim was also known as Anhõõke) conveyed lands lying to the east of the Bronx River in 1684. The reference reads:

"Upon the 14th of November, 1654 [sic], Thomas Pell of Fairfield, Connecticut, obtained a second grant from the aboriginal proprietors, which also embraced the present town. Thirty years later we find the sachems Maminepoe and Wampage conveying to the inhabitants of Westchester all that tract of land lying on the east side of Bronckses river.' [sic]"

Source: Bolton 1881, Vol. II, p. 263.

Wampage, Who Some Have Said Was the Alias of Anhõõke, Conveyed a Tract on May 27, 1692


Robert Bolton, Jr. included an unsupported reference in his second edition of the History of Westchester County published in 1881 purporting to quote what he described as an "INDIAN DEED OF WESTCHESTER". The reference reads:

"Upon the 27th of May, 1692, we find the Indian proprietors, Maminepoe and Wampage, conveying the following tract of land, to the trustees of [the Town of] Westchester.

INDIAN DEED OF WESTCHESTER.

'To all Christian people to whom this deed of sale shall come, greeting: Know ye, that wee, Maminepoe and Wampage alias Ann-hook, Indian proprietors of a certain tract of land lying within the limits and bounds of the patent of the county town of Westchester, in the province of New York, for a valuable consideration, and other considerations us thereunto moving, and having taken the advice and approbation of several native Indians here underwritten, to us in hand paid by John Palmer, William Barnes, William Richardson, Joseph Palmer, Samuel Palmer, Robert Huestis, John Ferris, John Hunt, Joseph Hunt, Josiah Hunt, Thomas Baxter, and Edward Collier, trustees of the freehold and commonality of the town of Westchester aforesaid, the receipt whereof we do hereby acknowledge and therewith to be lawfully satisfied, contented, and paid, and thereof do acquit, exonerate, and release, and discharge the said trustees, their heirs, successors, and assignees forever, have given, granted, bargained, sold, enfeoffed, [Page 290 / Page 291] released, and confirmed, and by these presents do fully, clearly, absolutely, give, grant, bargain, sell, enfeof, release, and confirm unto the said trustees, their heirs, successors and assignees forever, all that tract of land lying on the east side of BRUNXS'S river, beginning at the pine trees and so compassing all the land which we the said Maminepoe and Wampage layes claim to, until they come to the head of Rattle Snake brook, and from thence north-east to Mr. Pell's land, so north by saidPell's marked trees by Brunx's river, together with the woods, underwoods, timber, trees, waters, rivers, runs, brooks, and all and singular the emolluments, hereditaments, rights, privileges, and appurtenances, thereunto belonging or appertaining, (only reserving to ourselves the privelege of making use of white wood trees for our particular use,) to have and to hold the before recited premises, with all and every of its appurtenances, unto the said trustees, their heirs, successors, and asssignees [sic] to the only proper use and benefit and behoof of them the said trustees, their heirs, successors and assignees forever; and it shall and may be lawful for the said trustees, their heirs, successors, and assignees, from henceforth and forever, to have and to hold, use, occupy, and enjoy the siad tract of land, free from all incumbrances whatsoever, unto the said trustees, their successors and assignees for ever, without any manner of claime, challenge, or demand of us, our heirs, executors or administrators, or any other native Indians or Christian people, by, from, or under us, or any person or persons whatsoever; and we the said Maminepoe and Wampage, alias Ann-hook, shall and will forever warrant and defend the said tract of land unto the said freeholders of the corporation of Westchester, their heirs and assignees forever. In witness whereof we the said Maminepoe and Wampage, alias Ann-hook, shall and will forever warrant and defend the said tract of land unto the said freeholders of the corporation of Westchester, their heirs and assignees forever. In witness whereof we the said Maminepoe and Wampage, alias Ann-hook, have put to our hands and seales this 27th of May, the fourth year of their of their majesties reign, and A. D. 1692.

The mark of [Sideways "V", base to the Left] MAMINEPOE,
The mark of [Sideways "V", base to the Right] WAMPAGE, alias ANN-HOOK.
The mark of [Sideways "X"] CROHAMANTHENE,
The mark of [Sideways "P", base to the Left] MAMERTEKOH.

Signed, sealed, and deliver [sic] in presence of us,

ABRAHAM HAWKER,
ISAAC ARENS,
The mark of [Sideways "T" base to the Left] JOHN GARRETSON,

Native Indians witnesses to the above deed.
The mark of [Sideways "P" base to the Left] WEENETONAH,
The mark of <>

The following entry in the town books refers to this sale: --

'At a meeting of the inhabitants held the 27th 9f May, 1692, this day, the [Page 291 / Page 292] land on the east side of Broncks's river, till we come to Mr. Pell's line, was purchased of Mamineoe and Ann-hook for: --

2 gunns,
2 kettles,
2 coats,
2 adzes,
2 shirts
1 barrel of cider,
6 bitts of money.

DISBURSEMENTS UPON THE INDIAN PURCHASE.

WILLIAM BARNES, 1 kettle, . . . . . . £2 . . 2 . . 0
To expenses to ye Indians, . . . . . . . . . . 0. . 6 . . 0
JOHN HUNT, 1 coate,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . 12. . 0
For money, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . . 1. . 6
To Indian supper and other expences, .0 . . 3. . 0
WILLIAM RICHARDSON, 2 shirts,. . . 0 . .12. .0
JOHN FERRIS, sen, 1 coate, . . . . . . . . . 0 . .12. .0
To one day with the Indians, . . . . . . . . . 0. . . 3. .0
JOSEPH HUNT, 2 adzes, and 3s. 8d. in money. . .0 . 15. .0
SAMUEL PALMER, 1 gun. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . 0. . 0
THOMAS BAXTER, 1 gun. . . . . . . . . . . . 1. . .2. . 0
JOSEPH HUNT, 1 barrel of cider, . . . . . 0. . 3. . 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .£8 . . 4. . 6
ROBERT HUESTIS and THOMAS BAXTER, 1 gun. a [Footnote a reads "a Alb. Rec. gen entries. See also Town Rec. 27th of March, 174, Joseph Hunt was directed to go to the clerk of the county and see the Indian deed recorded."]"

Source: Bolton 1881, Vol. II, pp. 290-92.

Anhõõke Allegedly Confirmed the Ownership Rights of Inhabitants of the Town of East Chester Again in 1700

In the same volume, Bolton contends that "Ann Hooke" was among the Native Americans who confirmed the ownership rights of inhabitants of the Town of East Chester again in 1700. Bolton wrote:

"Upon the 23d day of December, A. D. 1700, we find the Indians confirming the inhabitants of Eastchester in their possession.

INDIAN DEED.

Be it known unto all to whom these presents may come, or concern; whereas the inhabitants of Eastchester did formerly purchase a certain tract of land of the natives, in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred sixty and six, and part of the same being not as yet satisfied, the said tract of land being butted and bounded as is hereafter expressed, viz. : east and south-east, by a certain river commonly called Hutchinson's river, which runs in at the head of the meadows, on the west bounds of Mr. Pell's patent, and southerly to Hutchinson's brook, and from the head thereof, north-west to Brunckses his river, and so all the land betwixt Hutchinson's and Brunckses his river, and so from the head of Hutchinson's river, northwest west to Brunckses river, and so all the land betwixt Hutchinson's and Brunckses rivers, according as aforementioned, NOW KNOW YE, that we, Woariatapus Annhook and Porrige, do owne, that we have received full satisfaction of Richard Shute, John Drake, and Henry Fowler, in the behalf of the rest of the inhabitants of Eastchester aforesaid, for the said tract of land, and we the abovesaid Woariatapus, Annhook and Porrige, do by these presents confirm unto the said Richard Shute, John Drake and Henry Fowler, in the behalf of the rest of the inhabitants of Eastchester aforesaid, their heirs and assigns forever, and we the above said Woariatapus, Annhook and Porrige, will warrant and defend the same from all incumbrances whatsoever, of any person or persons laying claime, right, title or demand, unto any part or parcel of the abovesaid tract of land, above mentioned, in witness whereof, we the said Woariatapus, Annhook and Porrige have hereunto put to our hands and seals, this third day of Dec., in the 12th year of his majestie's reign, A. D. 1700.

Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of us, Robert Bloomer, George Copping, David Whitlock.
Gramatan Sachem,
The mark of [Sideways "X"] Woariatabus
The mark of AH Ann Hooke,
Porrige"

Source: Bolton, supra, id., p. 210.

Anhõõke Allegedly Sold Land to George Booth and Others in 1705

In the same volume, Bolton wrote as follows:

"On the 6th of April, 1705, Patthunck, Sagamore, Hopesco alias Porrige, Anne Hook, and Elias, Indian proprietors, sold to George Booth, joiner of the city of New York and his associates,

'All that our right of land which is not yet lawfully purchased, lying and being from the land which is now in dispute betwixt Westchester and Eastchester, and so running along by Bronck's river, to Hutchinson's river, and bounded on the north by Eastchester lyne, to have and to hold, &c.'"

Source: Id., p., 211.

Carefully scrutiny of other early records likely will reveal more about Anhõõke. These research notes are only the beginning.

Please Visit the Historic Pelham Web Site
Located at
http://www.historicpelham.com/.
Please Click Here for Index to All Blog Postings.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,