Historic Pelham

Presenting the rich history of Pelham, NY in Westchester County: current historical research, descriptions of how to research Pelham history online and genealogy discussions of Pelham families.

Tuesday, November 08, 2016

Allegations that Pelham Republicans Stole the Town's Democratic Primary in 1898




"I reject the cynical view that politics is a dirty business."

-- U. S. President Richard Milhous Nixon . . . .

With the 2016 U.S. presidential election upon us, it seems a perfect time to revisit how entertaining Pelham's own local politics have been over the years.  The subject has been fodder for a host of Historic Pelham articles including, by way of merely a few examples, the following:

Wed., Jan. 25, 2006:  The Pelham Manor Protective Club Flexed its Muscles in the 1886 Town Elections.  

Fri., Feb. 27, 2009:  More on the 1906 Village of North Pelham Elections in Which the Village Blacksmith Surprised Republicans and Democrats Alike and Won

Tue., Feb. 26, 2008:  Disputed Pelham School Board Election of 1882 Led to Charges of Fraud.  

Fri., July 8, 2005:  How Did a Village Blacksmith Win the 1906 North Pelham Election by Cornering the Market on Sleighs? 

Tue., Oct. 14, 2014:  "There Is Endless Bitterness of Heart" -- Pelham Manor Women Pull a Fast One in 1882.

Mon., Jun. 08, 2015:  Was "Honest Jim Reilly" Really So Honest?  Blacksmith and, Later, Politician in the Village of North Pelham Died in 1937.

Wed., Aug. 17, 2005:  More on the Village Blacksmith Who Won the 1906 North Pelham Election by Cornering the Market on Sleighs.

Thu., Mar. 12, 2015:  Pelham Democrats Purportedly Stole the Supervisor Election in 1886 by Importing Paupers from Hart Island to Vote.

Wed., Mar. 23, 2016:  The Bitter Battle Over the Incorporation of the Village of North Pelham in 1896 Continued After The Vote to Incorporate.

Thu., May 12, 2016:  Forget Luck of the Irish! We Should All Have the Luck of the North Pelham Democrats (At Least in 1901).

Today's posting to the Historic Pelham Blog tells the story of how Pelham Republicans stole the Town Democratic Primary on Monday, March 14, 1898 to ensure that their Republican slate for Town officers would appear on the Democratic ticket during the general election as well.  The story is quite simple and revolves around the notice of the primary vote.

It seems that in advance of the highly-anticipated "Democratic Primary and Convention" in the Town of Pelham, notice of the vote stated that the vote would take place on March 14 from "8 to 9 o'clock."  Democrats were to vote for County Committeeman, Town Committee, and delegates to the Town Convention.  The notice, however, did not state whether the vote would be in the a.m. or the p.m.

No suspicions were raised among Democrats because the notice made clear that the Town Democratic Convention would be held the same day.  Such conventions previously had been held in the evening, immediately following the vote.  This time, however, things would be different. . . . 

There were a number of Pelhamites in on the scheme who were described in one account as the "knowing ones."  The knowing ones knew something unusual was afoot.  Additionally, "all arrangements [had been] made" in advance.

Promptly at 8:00 a.m. that Tuesday, the polls were declared open and voting began.  Promptly at 9:00 a.m., the polls were declared closed.  Only seven votes were cast.  It appears that the seven votes were cast by the "knowing ones" . . . . 

The Democratic Convention was held that evening as in previous years.  As one might expect, however, during the day word trickled out that the primary vote had been held that morning and that Frank Lyon had been elected County Committeeman while W. A. McGalliard, Charles A. Barker, and several others had been elected to the Town Democratic Committee.

The entire Town was abuzz throughout the day with the news that the "knowing ones" had pulled a fast one in an apparent effort to take control of the upcoming Town Democratic Convention scheduled for later that evening.  When the Convention opened, Pelham's rank and file Democrats packed the old Town Hall.  Indeed a crowd gathered for a little good old-fashioned entertainment.  What next happened to the rank and file Democrats reportedly "took their breath away."  

Frank Lyon acted as Chair of the convention.  Lincoln White acted as Secretary.  The Town Committee and the Convention promptly endorsed the entire Republican Ticket to run on the Democratic ticket for Town offices (except the candidate for Tax Collector and two Town Constables).  In the case of Tax Collector, the Committee and the Convention endorsed Charles A. Barker for the candidacy -- one of those who had participated in the shenanigans.  

The crowd was furious and let out a chorus of hisses.  As the crowd hissed, the Chair quickly declared the Convention closed.  Only then did the room settle enough for rank and file Democrats to demand another session.  With the Convention closed, however, "it was too late and the party must abide by the action of the convention."

It was, according to one local newspaper, "one of the most remarkable primaries ever held."  Only in Pelham, only in Pelham folks. . . . . . 



The Old Town Hall on Fifth Avenue Where Today's Town
Hall Stands.  Here the Democratic Convention Following
the Primary Vote on March 14, 1898 Took Place.
NOTE:  Click on Image to Enlarge. 

Please exercise your right today, dear Pelham, and vote!




*          *           *          *          *

Immediately below is the text of a newspaper article about the events that form the basis of today's article.  It is followed by a citation and link to the source.

"PELHAM'S QUEER PRIMARY AND CONVENTION.
-----
A CONFUSING PRIMARY CALL RESPONSIBLE.
-----
The Republican Ticket Practically Endorsed.
-----

The Democrats of Pelham held their primary Monday.  It was in more than one sense of the term the most curious meeting ever held in that old town.  The call for the meeting read from '8 to 9 o'clock.'

It did not state whether this was to be a.m. or p.m. and a majority of the party took it for granted that it would be p.m. as the convention was advertised to be held on the same day.

However, a few of the knowing ones had all arrangements made, and at 8 o'clock in the morning the polls were declared open and voting for County Committeeman, Town Committee, and delegates to the Town Convention was begun and candidates for these offices chosen.

It is reported that when the polls closed at 9 o'clock there had been just seven votes cast.

Frank Lyon was elected to the County Committee, and the Town Committee was made up of W. A. McGalliard, Charles A. Barker, and several others.

The primary naturally formed the topic of conversation on the street of this quiet little town and when evening came a crowd gathered in the old Town Hall.  Frank Lyon acted as chairman of the convention and Lincoln White, Secretary.

What surprised the rank and file more than anything else, and almost took their breath away, was the endorsing of the entire Republican ticket with the exception of Tax collector and for this office Charles Barker was named.

The constables nominated were Democrats.

When the ticket was named a round of hisses went over the room.  Several Democrats protested after the convention adjourned and threatened to call another session but the time had gone by, it was too late and the party must abide by the action of the convention.

It was one of the most remarkable primaries ever held."

Source:  PELHAM'S QUEER PRIMARY AND CONVENTION -- A CONFUSING PRIMARY CALL RESPONSIBLE -- The Republican Ticket Practically Endorsed, Mount Vernon Daily Argus [Mount Vernon, NY], Mar. 15, 1898, Vol. XXIV, No. 1816, p. 1, col. 6.


Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Pelham Democrats Purportedly Stole the Supervisor Election in 1886 by Importing Paupers from Hart Island to Vote


Hart Island is about 85 acres and lies due east of City Island.  The status of the island as either within the Town of Pelham or outside the Town of Pelham during the last half of the nineteenth century created confusion in a host of contexts including in Town elections.



Detail of 1867 Beers Map Showing Hart Island Shortly
Before John Hunter, Jr. Sold it to New York City.
Source:  Beers, Ellis & Soule, Atlas of New York and
Vicinity From Actual Surveys By and Under the Direction
of F. W. Beers, Assisted by Geo. E. Warner & Others, p. 7
(Philadelphia, PA:  Beers, ellis & Soule, 1867)

The confusion seems to have arisen from the fact that New York City bought the island in 1868 from John Hunter, Jr. for $75,000 for use as a municipal prison  and Potter's Field for the indigent.  See Westchester County Records of Land Conveyances, Liber 674, Page 447 (available at Westchester County Archives; thanks to Mark Gaffney for providing this reference).  New York City did not, however, annex the island to make it part of New York City at the time.  Thus, New York City owned the land, but the land remained within the Town of Pelham.  Pelham viewed the island owned and maintained by New York City as part of New York City and did not consider the island when dealing with town affairs.

Pelham residents recognized that the situation was ripe with possibilities for election fraud, particularly in town elections for such a tiny town where a handful of votes could change the results.  Indeed, as early as 1882, Pelham residents were concerned that some inhabitants of Hart Island insisted on voting in Town of Pelham elections.  The records of the Pelham Manor Protective Club indicate that on April 1, 1882, representatives of the "Law and Order Society of City Island" met with representatives of the Pelham Manor Protective Club "to see if we could not stop the residents of Hart's Island from voting in the town of Pelham."  The Records of The Pelham Manor Protective Club, p. 20 entry for April 1, 1882 ("At a meeting of the Executive Committee of the P. M. P. Club held at the residence of G. H. Reynolds April 1st 1882.  Reynolds, Black, Barnett, and De Witt were present, also a committee from the Law and Order Society of City Island, consisting of Messrs. Bell, Mority, and McAllister, whose purpose in metting with us was to see if we could not stop the residents of Hart's Island from voting in the town of Pelham.") (original in collections of the Westchester County Historical Society).  

In 1884, the Chief Clerk in the Election Bureau of the City of New York issued a formal opinion blessing the practice of Hart Island inhabitants voting in Pelham elections.  A brief article described the development:

"The Hart's Island Vote.

An employee in one of the city's institutions on Hart's Island wrote to the Election Bureau to ask where he ought to vote at the coming election -- in Pelham or in New York.  Investigation showed that custom sanctioned Pelham as the polling place of inhabitants of Hart's Island, while the map plainly put the island in Westchester county.  On the other hand, chapter 238 of the Laws of 1869, which empowered the Charity Commissioners to establish an industrial school on Hart's Island, referred to the island as the property of the city and county of New York.  To offset this, in the Revised Statutes of 1875 Hart's Island is included in the town of Pelham, while chapter 782 of the Laws of 1870 takes the same view, saying that the boundary line had not been altered since Capt. Bond drew his map in 1711.  The Chief Clerk of the Election Bureau concluded that the balance of authority lay with Pelham, and advised the anxious inquirer to vote there.  The vote of Hart's Island is not large.  The island is tenanted chiefly by the dead in Potter's Field."

Source:  The Hart's Island VoteThe Sun [NY, NY], Aug. 31, 1884, p. 6, col. 2.  

The following year, in 1885, City Island Democrat Sherman T. Pell ran against Republican Robert H. Scott for Town Supervisor of Pelham.  The election was a close one.  Scott beat Pell by ten votes.  See City and Suburban News - Westchester County, N. Y. Times, Apr. 2, 1885, p. 8.  

Sherman Pell and his Democratic cronies took time to formulate a plan for the following year's election.  They concluded that the decision by the Chief Clerk of the Election Bureau offered an opportunity that was simply too tempting to ignore.  The following year, Sherman Pell ran once again against incumbent Supervisor Scott.    

In that 1886 election, Sherman Pell and his Democrat cronies took advantage of the determination by the Chief Clerk of the Election Bureau that inhabitants of Hart Island could vote in Pelham elections.  First they packed the Democratic caucus that year with men from Hart Island to enable Pell to defeat former Town Supervisor James Hyatt and another up-and-coming Democrat for the Democratic nomination for Town Supervisor.  Second, they arranged to transport 25 men from Hart Island to vote in the town-wide election -- an unprecedented number of Hart Island "voters."  

The election was even closer than before.  On March 30, 1886, Sherman Pell won the election by a single vote.  The election, however, was clouded in a scandal that had Pelham tongues wagging for at least a decade.  Pell's Republican opponent Robert H. Scott announced after the election that he intended to contest the election "on the ground that 25 persons who voted for Mr. Pell were brought over from Hart's Island, and that two-thirds of them were New-York paupers having no right to vote."  Westchester County, N.Y. Times, Apr. 3, 1886, p. 8.

Sherman T. Pell's election shenanigans in the 1886 Town Supervisor election foreshadowed his more serious shenanigans once he was entrenched in the office.  When he finally lost the 1893 Town Supervisor election after seven years in office, he disappeared.  Soon it was discovered that for years Pell had executed notes on behalf of the Town, forged the signature of the Town Clerk, and sold the forged bonds on Wall Street while pocketing the proceeds.  According to a variety of reports, Pell stole amounts totaling between $30,000 and $100,000.  Pell fled to parts unknown (though rumors claimed he fled to South America).  He was never caught and was never heard from again.  See Bell, Blake A., Take the Money and Run:  Pelham Town Supervisor Sherman T. Pell, The Pelham Weekly, Vol. XIV, Issue 19, May 13, 2005, p. 14, col. 2.  



Daguerrotype Showing Family of Samuel Pell of City Island.
Arrow Points to a Young Sherman T. Pell Who, as Town Supervisor,
Later Forged Town of Pelham Bonds, Sold Them to Wall Street
and Pocketed the Proceeds.  Source:  Digital Collection of the Author.

*          *           *          *          *

Below is text from a series of articles referencing the incidents that are the subject of today's posting to the Historic Pelham Blog.  Each is followed by a citation and link to its source.

"At the town election in the town of Pelham, on the 30th ult., Sherman T. Pell, democrat, was elected Supervisor, of the town over R. H. Scott, the republican candidate, by one majority.  Now Mr. Scott being disgruntled, contests the election on the ground that of those who voted for Mr. Pell twenty-five were brought over fro Hart's Island, and that of these eighteen were paupers belonging in New York and having no right to vote at all."

Source:  [Untitled], The Eastern State Journal [White Plains, NY], Apr. 10, 1886, Vol. XLII, No. 1, p. 3, col. 3.

"PELHAM AND CITY ISLAND.

WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE RE-ELECTED.

The annual town election is to take place on the 29th inst., and as a natural consequence the people are casting about for not only eligible but the most suitable candidates.

In the town of Pelham a few weeks ago it was conceded that Mr. Sherman T. Pell would be almost the unanimous choice for the office of Supervisor, but of late some of the more thoughtful have been inquiring into his record, and we are forced to say that in some very important matters it is not an enviable one.

Last spring Mr. Pell was elected Supervisor of Pelham, by a bare majority of one vote, and where that vote and several others came from will be shown below.  The Chronicle has watched Mr. Pell's record closely, and we must say that while he has shown commendable zeal in some minor matters, in the more important affairs of the town where he should have stood as a bulwark to guard the people's interests, he has shown himself to be totally unfit for the honorable and trusted position which he holds.

Below are given some of the reasons why Mr. Pell should not be re-elected.  If he can justify his acts therein detailed, the Chronicle will cheerfully accord him ample space to do so.  

First -- As regards his election -- Twenty or thirty men came over from Hart's Island and voted for Mr. Pell at the last election; these men had no interest in, or knowledge of the town affairs; they were employees and inmates of the City Institutions on the Island.  The introduction of such an element into our town affairs, is wrong; unless it is rebuked by the honest and intelligent citizens of the town, it may furnish a dangerous tool in the hands of the unscrupulous men who wish to use the town government for their own personal and selfish purposes.  Of course as Mr. Pell's majority was only one, the votes of the Hart's Island men elected him.

There is littlle doubt that the following men voted for Mr. Pell.  Their residences appeared on the official list of the employees of the City Departments, published in the City Record in the January before the town election as follows:

Arthur Connor, residence, 20 Greenwich street, N. Y. City; Andrew McCauley, residence, 10 Charles Lane, N. Y. City; David T. Corde, residence, 59 Clinton Place, N. Y. City; John Murphy, residence, 511 East 15th street, N. Y. City; William Langhorst, residence, 158 East 23rd street, N. Y. City; Bernard Arthur, residence, 70 East 3rd street, N. Y. City; where his wife resides.  Mr. Arthur admitted after the election that he had resided at the above address for five years.  He registered and voted in New York City in November before the town election.  David T. Corde also voted at the November election in New York City.

Second -- On the 14th of September, 1886, seven persons presented to the Supervisor, an application under the provisions of a Statute of this State for a franchise to form a company to supply the town of Pelham with water.  

The active men among these applicants were W. R. Lambberton and Moses R. Crow, the former the attorney for the applicants and the friend of Mr. Pell, and the latter, the disgruntled Vice President of the New York and Mt. Vernon Water Company, whose hostility to that Company is no secret.  They proposed to form the Southern Westchester Water Company.

Giving them no particulars of the object of the meeting, Mr. Pell called a meeting of the Town Board and Highway Commissioners, on two days' notice, presented to them for their signatures a lithographed document which granted an exclusive franchise to the applicants to use the roads of Pelham for their pipes, and which bound the Town to allow no other company to be formed in the Town or to use the roads to supply its residents with water.  In return they were to receive, one dollar and one per cent. of the net earnings, which,, it need not be said, would never amount to anything.  The company furnished no security that they would ever complete the works, or furnish the town with water, though the town bound itself to get it from no other source; they did not even offer to indemnify the town for accidents they might cause in tearing up the roads.  This document purported to be a proposition emanating from the town, yet it was drawn by Mr. Lamberton, the applicant, and was never submitted to, or seen by the Town Counsel.  Naturally, objection was made in the Board and it was suggested that the Town Counsel should be consulted, and that such an important matter should be publicly discussed, but Mr. Pell said, it was all right, and he urged immediate action.  Thus it went through, to the delight of Messrs. Lamberton and Crow, who were present.  Fortunately one chance of escape remained open to the town for the proposition could not be accepted till the company was organized and officers elected.

The Town Counsel, heard of it unofficially and wrote to the Supervisor, setting forth the effects of the contract which were so disadvantageous to the town, and also advising him that the town had no power to grant an exclusive franchise in the roads; he advised an immediate rescission of the resolution, so far as it granted such a franchise.  The case was so plain that the Supervisor could not refuse, without manifestly betraying the interests of the town.  So the resolution was rescinded, and the applicants notified in less than a week.

The Town was saved from great loss and disadvantage and the Town of Pelham escaped from being an involuntary force in the internecine struggle which is being waged between the hostile factions in the New York and Mount Vernon Water Company.  

Now, how does Mr. Pell come out of this matter:  He has asserted that he did not know until after the meeting of the 16th of September, that the exclusive franchise had been granted, and that he did not think that that part of the contract was read to him, yet his name is signed at the foot of the grant, and he vouched for its propriety so vigorously that he calmed the objections of his colleagues.  If he did not know, how can he excuse such wretched carelessness and ignorance?  How can he justify his failure to refer the document to the Town Counsel?  When asked how he knew that the Town had power to enter into such a contract and that the application was in accordance with law, he said he supposed such was the case, for he had been told so by Messrs. Lamberton and Crow.

Now, either Mr. Pell used his position as Supervisor to advisedly put a matter through the Town Board, which was glaringly to the disadvantage of the town, or he showed himself woefully incompetent for office in allowing such a ridiculously one-sided contract to be sanctioned by him, and that, too, without any advice but from the most interested parties.

If he rests upon the latter alternative, he can only do so by admitting that he was deceived by Mr. Lamberton in a matter where the interests of the town were at stake.  How then can Mr. Pell consistently say this and continue to trust Mr. Lamberton to handle important town matters?  Mr. Pell has employed him as special counsel to advocate a bill now before the legislature for the relief of Pelham, by the taxation of the park lands in the town, and has not given any outward indication that he considers him less public spirited than before.

Mr. Pell has used his position to gain political strength, and it has been considered that he could not be beaten; but some respectable man of common sense will be found, who will be elected, and will reform the methods he has inaugurated.  Party is of little consequence, but freedom from entangling alliances is of the utmost importance."

Source:  PELHAM AND CITY ISLAND, The Chronicle [Mount Vernon, NY], Mar. 11, 1887, Vol. XVIII, No. 966, p. 1, cols. 6-7.

"PELHAM AND CITY ISLAND.

The indications are that the political campaign this year will be the liveliest one Pelham has seen in many a day.

The present management of the town affairs of Pelham look all right on the surface, but they won't stand investigation.  The Independent is on the correct tack this time in most respects regarding that town, and the Chronicle acknowledges the 'corn.'

The plan of electing Mr. Pell Supervisor seems to contemplate the election of Mr. H. D. Carey, as Justice of the Peace, to fill the vacancy caused by the failure of Mr. Jerome Bell to qualify.  The Chronicle believes that the people of the town will see the great impropriety of having in the Town Board any officer or even stockholder of the City Island Railroad Company.  We understand that Mr. Carey owns more than 100 shares of the stock of this company.  We have not a word to say against Mr. Carey.  He is very much of a gentleman, and no doubt would be a good justice; but questions will come up before the Town Board. with reference to the railroad, in the course of its construction, and perhaps suits will have to be brought.  Mr. C's sense of propriety should dictate to him that under these circumstances he ought not to be in the Board.  Nor doe we think that Mr. Bell, who was careless or indifferent enough not to qualify, ought to be given another chance.

Jurstice Patterson, as upright an officer as Pelham ever had, is being flattered by some Democrats into the belief that they want him for justice in Pelhamville.  They don't mean what they say, but, if they take the Chronicle' sadvice they will nominate him.  Mr. Hogan is another Democrat that these same democrats think they can soothe with sweet words.  Mr. Hogan is peculiar, almost eccentric.  He is pretty capable, but he speaks his thoughts too plainly for some people.  They say they will make him assessor.  This, they think will appease him, and he will not be in the Town Board.  The Chronicle makes no promises, but it believes that if the Democratic party nominates for Supervisor such a man as Hogan or Fordham, or Hyatt, it will be a good thing for the town, and the party.  We fear Mr. Hogan will not consent to have his name used, but if he should, and Mr. Scott would consent to run as an Independent or Republican, the result would be a canvass in which the Chronicle would take great interest.

This leads us to say that we understand that Mr. Scott has yielded to the importunities of his friends, and has consented to head an Independent ticket.  To Mr. Scott, service to the town means a serious business inconvenience.  But it is eminently proper that he should be the candidate, for many people who voted against him last year are more than anxious to vote for him this year, to rebuke the Hart's Island business, of which he was the victim.

By the way, it was the use of the Hart's Island vote in the Democratic caucus that nominated Mr. Pell and defeated Messrs. Hyatt and Hogan, though Mr. Hyatt was no doubt the choice of the majority of the best class of Democrats.

Some of the Democrats of Pelham are beginning to think that Mr. Pell has shown by his associations that he is a little too much of a Republican for them.  

In addition to those referred to, Mr. Delcambre is mentioned as a candidate for the Justiceship, which belongs to Pelhamville.  Mr. Lamberton, too, has been mentioned.  For Town Clerk, the incumbent of that office, Mr. Waterhouse, is mentioned by the Republicans, and Mr. James D. Bell, by the Democrats.  For Collector, the Republicans are talking about Charles Bell, and the Democrats are divided between Messrs. Daniel Craft and John F. Adams, the present Collector.  For Road Commissioner, the Democrats talk of Wm. Cochran, Hugh Ryan and Mr. Connolly, and the Republicans of A. S. Wilson.  It is charged that the Democrats are encouraging the nomination of A. S. Wilson so that Mr. Cochran can be re-elected.  If this is so the Republicans should find another candidate.

The election in Pelham this year seems to be so much more important than usual, that the Chronicle suggests to both parties that they hold their caucuses in time to allow a full discussion of the qualifications of the candidates."

Source:  PELHAM AND CITY ISLAND, The Chronicle [Mount Vernon, NY], Mar. 15, 1887, Vol. XVIII, No. 967, p. 1, col. 6.

"PELHAM AND CITY ISLAND.


The Country Club of Pelhham, it is understood, propose to purchase the grounds near Bartow, now leased by them and make that a permanent headquarters.

If the Democrats will nominate men whom the party can support, we will not see any more money thrown away in patches or fences -- Westchester Independent.

Accomplish the same result by voting for Scott.

Mr. Sherman T. Pell expects to be the Democratic candidate for supervisor.  He also expects the party to vote straight on election day.  Why doesn't he set the example?  His party is watching him.

The Westchester Independent is very anxious to find out where something like $43,000 has gone the past year.  The supervisor ought to be able to tell, if he would.

The interest in the approaching town election suffers no abatement.  The water franchise business, as shown up by the Chronicle, has attracted a great deal of attention, and was news to many who are usually well posted in town affair.  It is generally felt that Mr. Pell's (or Mr. Lamberton's) reply to the statements made in the Chronicle is very lame, and does not meet the issue.  Of course, every one understands the remarks about employing labor, etc.  This is mere demagogism.  No one for a moment supposes that Mr. Pell is a bit more favorable to our laboring population than Mr. Scott, who seems likely to be his opponent this year.  It is no argument for Mr. Pell; and does anybody even dream that he wanted the water franchise put through in order to benefit the laboring people of Pelham?  This is easily seen through.  The workmen know that their best friends are the solid men who contantly employ them, and not those who try to rush jobs through the Town Board, increase taxes, and then try to excuse themselves by saying they wanted to benefit the laborers.

It is good news that Mr. Scott has finally consented to be a candidate for the office of Supervisor.  There is a strong feeling among the solid citizens, both Democratic and Republican on City Island, and on 'the Main,' that the best interests of the town demand his election.  Nobody has forgotten where Mr. Pell's majority of one vote came from last year.  It was unquestionably by the votes of men brought over from Hart's Island, that he was elected -- men who can have no earthly interest in the town affairs, and many of them shown to have been registered as living in New York City just before the election; and Mr. Pell has not the shadow of a chance of success this year against Mr. Scott, except possibly by the employment of the same means.  The polls will be more carefully watched this year.  As to Mr. Scott's qualifications for the office, there is only one opinion.  He is a thoroughly reliablle man.  He has been tried and not found wanting."  

Source:  PELHAM AND CITY ISLAND, The Chronicle [Mount Vernon, NY], Mar. 22, 1887, Vol. XVIII, No. 969, p. 3, col. 2.



ON HART'S ISLAND."  Source:  Art and Picture Collection,
The New York Public Library. "New York City --
Metropolitan Charities -- The Bible And Fruit Mission To
The Public Hospitals -- Ministering To The Convalescent Patients
On Hart'S Island." The New York Public Library Digital Collections. 1879.


Order a Copy of "Thomas Pell and the Legend of the Pell Treaty Oak." 

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 30, 2009

Philadelphia Lawyer Questioned Title of All Pelham Property Owners in 1877

I recently ran across an odd item that I previously knew nothing about.  It involved a reported effort by a lawyer in Philadelphia to raise questions about the validity of titles of property owners throughout Pelham in an effort to extract settlement funds from local property owners.  The whole matter smacks of a scam that periodically hits members of the Rose Family who are convinced that due to defects in title, they may be owners of large portions of lower Manhattan once owned by Trinity Church.  A cryptic reference to Trinity Church in the article below even suggests as much. 

The article appeared on the front page of the July 27, 1877 issue of The Chronicle published in Mount Vernon, New York.  The text is followed by a citation to its source.

"HEIRS TO PELHAM MANOR.

We do not think that any of the owners of property in Pelham need worry about the following, which is copied from on of our exchanges.  It contains much interesting matter apart from the claims it undertakes to establish. 

From time to time, of late years, the validity of titles to large tracts of real estate in and about the city of New York have been contested by persons believing themselves to be the lawful heirs thereto, with varying results.  Preliminary steps are now being taken to contest the titles held by certain persons owning property in Westchester County, and the singular manner in which the discovery of the presumed rightful ownership of the property was made as well as immediate local interest, make the circumstances of the case worthy of publication.  The property involved consists of over 9,000 acres of land, lying for the most part along Long Island Sound.  Several beautiful villages are built on the land, which, altogether, is worth several millions.  The discovery of the title now alleged to be correct grew out of the litigations over Trinity Church.

In the summer of 1859, Mrs. M. D. Kellogg, of Binghamton, a widow lady, paid a visit to relatives in Oswego, N.Y.  While walking along the bank of the Susquehana River, one bright afternoon, with a friend, Mrs. Kellogg was shown the residence of a woman named Bliss, whose powers as a clairvoyant, were highly esteemed by the spiratualistic residents of the village.  In a spirit of banter Mrs. Kellogg challenged her friend to visit Mrs. Bliss, and the challenge was accepted.  Mrs. Kellogg was taken into a private room by the clairvoyant, and speedily informed of certain matters connected with the affairs of her then recently deceased husband which the widow believed none knew but herself.  Then, to her greater astonishment, the clairvoyant said:

'You are heir to a large property.'

'I think not,' replied Mrs. Kellogg:  'I never heard of any such thing.  Is the property in England?'

'No,' replied Mme. Bliss; 'It is not far off and lies beside a large sheet of water.' 

Mrs. Kellogg left the woman, dismissed the whole subject from her mind and had nearly forgotten it until over two years later, when it was brought again to her mind by a cousin of hers, a Mrs. Bayliss, of Binghamton, who informed her that she had just learned that she was heir to a large property in New York, and that the family would all come in for a share.

Living in Philadelphia at the time were four female cousins, descendants of the New York Grays.  Miss Jane Dean was one of these cousins, and she had been informed by her dying mother that the family were heris to a large estate in the neighborhood of New York.  What that property was the mother of Jane Dean could not tell, and as about that time persons claiming to be interested in the Trinity property were endeavoring to establish their titles, Miss Dean jumped to the conclusion that she must be a descendant of Anneke Jans.  At that time a Philadelphia lawyer, named Wm. Linn Brown, was working in the interest of claimaints for the Trinity estate.  Some person, as a joke, inserted an advertisement in a Philadelphia newspaper, requesting all persons who believed themselves such heirs to meet on a certain day in Lawyer Brown's office.  The Dean girls read this advertisement, and in good faith went to Brown's office.  Of course their visit was a surprise to him, but he courteously glanced over the genealogical tree he had made of the owners of Trinity estate, and informed Miss Jane Dean that she was not an heir.  With some disgust and considerable disappointment, Miss Dean left the office, saying, as she closed the doors, 'One thing I do know--I am a descendant of Lord Pell.'  According to Brown's statement, the parting shot, so to speak, of the would-be heiress furnished him some food for thought.  He recalled being on Hunter's Island, in the Sound, near New York, and remembered a conversation with Mr. Hunter, its owner, who told him that he had paid $80,000 for the property; that with the improvements it was worth $200,000, and that his title was defective.  'It belongs to Pelham Manor,' said Mr. Hunter in conclusion, 'and I wish you would hunt up the heirs.'  Brown thereupon informed the Deans that they must be heirs to Pelham Manor, and he was paid to visit Albany and make searches, where he found the original grant of the land from the Duke of York to Thomas Pell, of which the following is a copy:

'Richard Nicolls, Esq., Governor under His Royal Highness the Duke of York, of all his territories in America.  To all to whom these presents shall come, Greeting, Whereas, There is a certain tract of land within this government upon the main, situated, lying and being to eastward of Westchester bounds, bounded to the westward by the river called by the Indians Aqueouncke, commonly known by the name of Hutchinson's River, which runneth into the bay lying between Throgmorton's Neck and Hook's Neck, commonly called Hutchinson's Bay, bounded on the east by a brook called Cedar Tree Brook, and on the south by the Sound which lieth between Long Island and the main land, with all the islands in the Sound not already granted or otherwise disposessed of, lying before explained, and northwards to run into the woods, about eight English miles in breadth as the bounds to the Sounc -- which said tract of land hath heretofore been purchased from the Indian proprietors and satisfaction given for the same.

'Now know ye that by virtue of the commission and authority unto me given by His Royal Highness James, Duke of York, etc., upon whom by lawful grant and patent from His Majesty, the proprietor and government of that part of the main land, as well as of Long Island as all the islands adjacent among other things as settled. 

'I have thought proper to give, grant, confirm and ratify unto Thomas Pell, of Oncknay, alias Fairfield, in His Majesty's colony of Connecticut, gentleman, his heirs and assigns, all the said tract of land, bounded as aforesaid together with all the lands, islands, seas, bays, woods, meadows, pastures, marshes, lakes, waters, creeks, fishing, hawking, huntin, and fowling, and all other profits, and that the said tract of land and islands, and appurtenances shall be forever hereafter had, deemed, reputed, taken and be an enfranchised township, manor and place itself, and shall always from time, and at all times hereafter, have, hold and enjoy like and equal privileges with any town, enfranchised place or manor within this government, and in no manner of way be subordinate or belonging unto any other township or jurisdiction, but shall in all be held as an entire enfranchised township, manor and place of itself in this Government; to have and to hold the said tract of land-grant with all and singular the appurtenances, premises and privileges, immunities, and franchises given and granted unto the said Thomas Pell, to his heirs and assigns, to the proper use and behoof of the said Thomas Pell, his heirs and assigns forever, freely and clearly in so large and ample manner with all the privileges as before expressed, as if he had held the same immediately from His Majesty the King of England etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., his successor as of the manor of East Greenwich in the county of Kent is free and common seaage [sic], and by fealty only yielding, rendering and paying yearly unto His Royal Highness the duty forever, and his heirs, or to such Governor as from time to time be constituted and appointed, as an acknowledgement [sic] one lamb upon the first day of May, if the same shall be demanded.

'Given under my hand and seal, at Fort James, in New York, on the island of Manhattan, the sixth day of October, in the eighteenth year of the reign of our sovereign lord Charles the Second, by the grace of God, of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, etc., etc., and in the year of our Lord God, 1666.

RICHARD NICOLLS.

'Entered and recorded in the office of New York, the eighth day of October, 1666.

Attest:  MATHAIS NICOLLS.

The changes in the names of the localities mentioned in the grant make it extremely difficult for one who is acquainted only with the present names of boundary marks in Westchester County, and points along the Sound to satisfactorily define the precise limits of the grant.  From Albany, Brown went to Fairfield, Conn., where he found a variety of documents on record bearing on the case.  The original grant of Pelham Manor from the Indians is dated Nov. 14th, 1654 [sic], and embraced 9,166 acres [sic], bounded as follows:

'Embracing all that territory bounded on the east by a stream called Stony Brook, or river, and so running northward as the said brook or river runs eight English miles into the woods; thence west to Bronck's River to a certain bend in said river; thence by marked trees south until it reaches the tide waters of the Sound which lieth between Long Island and the mainland, together with all the islands in the Sound, etc., etc., Signed by the Sachem and five chiefs.

When Lawyer Brown informed the Dean girls that they were probably heirs to Pelham Manor, they wrote to Arthur Gray, of Binghamton, requesting information about his family.  Arthur Gray died soon after the receipt of the letter and before he had an opportunity of answering it, and it came into the possession of his son, Christopher Gray.  He showed the letter to a lawyer named Richards, of Binghamton, who advised him that unless he wished to make a fool of himself to say nothing about it.  Mr. Gray said nothing for over a year, and then he informed Mrs. Bayliss who told Mrs. Kellogg.  Mrs. Kellogg at once answered the letter and invited the Dean girls to visit her, which they did, and information about the family was reciprocally imparted.  Both Mrs. Kellogg and the Deans began a search of the family genealogy, which is not yet fully completed, but sufficiently so, as those who so wish it claim, to prove themselves the rightful heirs of Sir Thomas Pell.  The original will of Thomas Pell is on record in Fairfield, Conn.  The following is a copy omitting a few personal legacies of no importance:

'The last will of Thomas Pell.

'In ye name of God, amen.

'It hath pleased ye all wise God many years to exercise me with much weakness of bondy, and having lately taken to Himself my beloved wife Lucy, it being ye good pleasure of God to deny me natural issue of my own body, His good hand of mercy continuing unto me to keep me in perfect memory and my understanding in in a comfortable measure according to the proportion of wisdom and knowledge which he saw meet to me, I desire in faith to give up my soul to God which gave it -- my body to a comely burial, that I may be decently buried in such a comely manner that God may not be dishonored.  It being my desire that peace may be attended in enjoyment of what God has seen pleased to give to me.  This being my last will and testament.  I do make my nephew living in Old England, the only son of my only brother, John Pell, Doctor of Divinity, which he had by his first wife, my whole and sole heir of all my lands and houses in any part of New England, in the territories of ye Duke of York.

I also give all my goods movable and whole and sole heir the plate, chattles and immovable whatsoever, and cattle of all kinds, except such parts and legacies as I give and bequath [sic] to persons my just debts being first paid.

'And if my nephew, John Pell, be decesased and hath left a son or sons surviving him, then what I have given to my nephew, John Pell, I give to such issue of his; and in default of such issue it is my will that my brother John Pell's daughter shall enjoy the above said portion; and in case they or any of them be deceased, then it my will that the children of my brother's daughter shall inherit the above said portion, to be equally divided amongst them.  It is my will that in case my nephew, John Pell, my brother's son by his first wife, be deceased, and hath left no male issue, if my brother hath a son or sons by his last wife, he or they shall enjoy ye above said portion, and in ye default of them or their male issue, then my brother's daughters or their children shall enjoy ye above portion as is above expressed.

'I make, ordain, constitute and appoint Daniel Burr and John Bankes to be my executors of trust, and order them to pay after my burial all my just debts and legacies, and to make sale of any utensils which are subject to decay -- old cattle -- and to be accountable to my heir or heirs, and to keep up housing and fencing, upon my heir's charge, that the estate may not suffer.

'In witness whereof I have herunto set my hand, this twenty and one years of the reign of our Sovereign lord King Charles, and the 21st of September, 1669.

(Signed) THOMAS PELL.

'Signed in presence of us,

'Nathan Gould,
'John Catell.'

This will was duly probated and recorded.  In 1675, John Pell, the heir sold to John Burr of Fairfield, all the meadows on Mill River, in Fairfield; and in December, 1685, sold John Smith, of the town Brunkland, Great Minneford's Island, opposite Ann Hook's Neck.  It appears that John Pell, son of John Pell, D.D., and heir of Thomas Pell, married Rachel Pinckney, and had by her two sons and several daughters.  John Pell died intestate in 1700 [sic].  The eldest son, Thomas Pell, took possession of the estate under English law.  Thomas pell second, married and had a son, Joseph Pell, to whom he willed the estate July 3d, 1739.  Joseph Pell married Zipporah Pell (a daughter of John Pell.)  The result of this marriage was seven children, David, Abner, Thomas, three daughters and Philip Pell, the latter supposed to be a posthumous son.  It was through these children that Lawyer Brown advised the descendants of the Grays to look for their heriship to Pell Manor.  The claimants of the estate have been advised, however, that when the Dutch came over and took possession of New York they brought with them new laws, and in accordance therewith, set aside the claim of Thomas Pell, son of John Pell, to the whole property, because his father died intestate, and divided the whole estate equally among each of John Pell's children, nine in number.  It has been learned that all of these nine children, with one exception, signed quit claim deeds of their share in the property.  This one exception was Mary Pell, who married Samuel Sands, a son of Samuel Sands of Sand's Point.  They had one daughter by this marriage, Mary Sands, who married Colonel John Reid at Hempstead, L. I., in 1721.  The fruit of this marriage was a daughter, named Euphsemie Reid, who married Daniel Reading, of Flemington, N.J.  A daughter, Mary Reading, was the result of this marriage, and she married Arthur Gray in Flemington.  Shortly after their marriage, they moved to Binghamton, N.Y., and reared a family of twelve children, who are now all dead.  There are in the neighborhood of one hundred children and grandchildren living in the neighborhood of Binghamton and Philadelphia at present. 

The would be heirs to Pelham Manor claim that the wills and titles of the property are so worded and reserved that the statute of limitations as to the holding of undisputed possession of property for twenty years giving absolute title does not apply to the case.  In case an absolute, unquestionable title can be established the only steps that the new heirs would attempt, would be to compromise with the owners of property on the estate, taking a per centage and giving therefore good titles."

Source:  Heirs to Pelham Manor, The Chronicle [Mount Vernon, NY], Vol. VIII, No. 410, Jul. 27, 1877, p. 1, col. 2.


Archive of the Historic Pelham Web Site.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,